The Borders We Share: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line (Post 36)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 6: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36)

Post 36: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line: Fog of Peace

Invocation Amid the Rolling Mist

In the swirling veil where the Thames’ dark waters lap against the ancient stones of London, the city’s fog-shrouded spires loom like half-remembered dreams, now braided with the stark divide of Belfast’s peace lines, where iron gates and razor wire scar the urban fabric like wounds that refuse to close. Here, Dr. Jorge, the series’ sage, stands with Sherlock Holmes, the unrivaled deductive mind, Dr. John Watson, his ever-present chronicler, and King Arthur, wielder of Excalibur’s enduring oath, joined by the spectral presences of Belfast’s architects of peace: John Hume, the Foyle fisherman whose words bridged chasms of hate; David Trimble, the unionist who dared to share power with those he once feared; Mo Mowlam, the minister who walked the maze of mistrust with a smile and a cigarette; and Bertie Ahern, the Taoiseach whose quiet persistence turned swords into plowshares. In The Borders We Share, we pursue not the conquest of stone but the unraveling of riddles to forge peace, where borders become puzzles solved in unity. As the morning sun pierces the London fog and casts long shadows across Belfast’s Falls and Shankill, we navigate the labyrinth of memory and reconciliation, where yesterday’s lines might dissolve into a harmony etched in brick and mist.

This series has traversed multiversal realms, from Sherwood’s verdant glades to Narnia’s regal ridges, echoing Congo’s wild pulse, Guyana’s gleaming riches, Borneo’s tangled lines, Tasmania’s resilient pines, the Amazon’s vital breath, Central Africa’s untamed expanse, Ruritania’s snowy peaks, Kashmir’s contested snows, Brobdingnag’s towering cliffs, the Golan’s thrones, Atlantis’ misty spires, Utopia’s crystalline summit, Cimmeria’s rugged range, Gibraltar’s monolithic rock fused with Laputa’s floating crags, Oz’s emerald avenues entwined with Jerusalem’s limestone hymns, Ruritania’s granite scars and Berlin’s concrete ghosts, and Dubai’s soaring spires against Laputa’s levitated heights. Post 36, the final stride in Section 6: Cities and Rocks, descends from vertical frontiers to the foggy divides of the British Isles, weaving Holmes’ London with Belfast’s lines. The dawn’s light fuses Holmes’s incisive logic, Watson’s steadfast quill, Arthur’s knightly grace, Hume’s bridging vision, Trimble’s courageous concession, Mowlam’s disarming wit, Ahern’s patient diplomacy, and my scholarly pursuit into a symphony that reverberates through the fog.

The city’s heartbeat syncs with ours, a muffled rhythm recalling our bond with these fog-veiled sanctuaries. Beyond land, this is a chronicle etched in brick—unionists marching to the drum of history, nationalists singing of green fields, peacemakers whispering across barricades, dreamers seeking a line that fades—all contending for the soul of the streets. London and Belfast offer a stage where empire and rebellion entwine, where the past’s foggy lines guide us toward a cleared horizon. This invocation calls you, reader, to walk with Holmes, Watson, Arthur, Hume, Trimble, Mowlam, Ahern, and me, where each drifting mist reveals a path to unity, a chance for London’s spires and Belfast’s lines to stand as reconciled kin.

Descent Through Foggy Alleys and Barricaded Streets

London, the imperial heart of 1,572 square kilometres, where the Thames winds through a labyrinth of history and hubris, has long been the distant architect of Ireland’s woes, its fog concealing the hand that drew the 1921 partition lines. Belfast, the industrial soul of Northern Ireland, spans 115 square kilometres scarred by three decades of the Troubles, where 3,532 lives were lost between 1969 and 1998, and the peace lines—forty-eight kilometres of iron, concrete, and wire—still divide Catholic Falls from Protestant Shankill, displacing 1,500 families annually to the urban fringes (Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, 2025). My Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) frames this as a classic sovereignty conflict involving two sovereign entities (UK and Ireland) and a populated third territory (Northern Ireland), with constitutive elements of population, territory, government, and law. The 1801 Act of Union, the 1916 Easter Rising, the 1921 partition, the 1969 deployment of British troops, and the 1998 Good Friday Agreement layer the narrative, yet the lines persist, with 120 peace walls standing as monuments to mistrust.

Belfast’s divides echo London’s imperial shadows, where the 1998 Agreement’s promise of devolution falters under Brexit’s 2016 rupture, displacing 2,000 cross-border workers daily (Irish Central Statistics Office, 2025) and reigniting 450 annual tensions at checkpoints (UK Border Force, 2025). Holmes and Watson, fresh from Dubai’s vertical frontiers, navigate these foggy alleys and barricaded streets with the same precision they once applied to Gibraltar’s tunnels, invoking the shared-sovereignty principles from Sovereignty Conflicts (2017): egalitarian consensus, efficiency, input-to-output ratio, and equilibrium proviso. My Territorial Disputes (2020) adds the multilayered view: sociological fractures between unionists and nationalists, leader prestige that sustains the status quo for electoral gain, and external forces—US funding for peace, EU mediation, and post-Brexit trade frictions—that both hinder and hasten resolution.

This descent through foggy alleys and barricaded streets is a pilgrimage to hear the cities’ muffled call, seeking a clearing where London’s spires and Belfast’s lines can dissolve in shared light. The weight of history—colonial pacts and paramilitary pacts—mirrors the fictional rift in Ruritania’s walls, where Rupert of Hentzau’s schemes echo the IRA’s shadows, urging a path beyond division to collaborative dawn. Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023) champions the moral equality of all residents, while Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) highlights guarantor mechanisms that achieved ninety-two percent durability in Latin American cases—models now invoked for Belfast’s lingering lines.

The Foggy Enigma Unraveled

These conflicts weave beyond brick into a rich mosaic of identity, memory, and the streets’ eternal murmur. My Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) casts this as a sovereignty riddle with cultural depth, where unionist and nationalist hold balanced stakes, yet the third territory—Belfast’s divided residents—demands inclusion. In London, the imperial legacy lingers in the Houses of Parliament, where Westminster’s debates once dictated Irish fates; population sub-elements, per Sovereignty Conflicts (2017), include numbers (irrelevant for colourable claim), ethnicity (multi-ethnic reality precludes imposition), language (English laced with Gaelic echoes), and religion (freedom of conscience secured, yet sectarian scars remain). In Belfast, the peace lines snake through the Falls and Shankill, where murals of hunger strikers face off against King Billy’s triumphant ride, their discord a cultural schism over the streets’ purpose, with Holmes’s deductions and Arthur’s round table unravelling the threads.

The historical weave bears the mark of empire and uprising. The 1801 Act of Union dissolved the Irish Parliament; the 1916 Easter Rising ignited republican fire; partition in 1921 birthed Northern Ireland amid civil war; the 1969 deployment of troops escalated the Troubles; the 1998 Good Friday Agreement brought devolution, yet Brexit’s 2016 shadow reignited pride—UK’s unionist hold, Ireland’s reunification dream—with cultural erosion as Gaelic phrases fade in the fog and Belfast murals crack under rain, displacing 1,500 families and 2,000 workers. Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) neutralises historical arguments via the original position, assuming rational parties resolve without violence; Territorial Disputes (2020) highlights leader prestige—Hume and Trimble’s concessions once bridged divides, but successors exploit fractures for votes.

A multidimensional lens is essential. The domestic mosaic—London’s cosmopolitan hum, Belfast’s sectarian resilience—intertwines with regional ties (EU mediation pre-Brexit) and global pacts (US special envoy role). Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023) advocates preserving these voices through non-interference, basic liberties, and law of peoples; Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) proposes guarantors like the 1998 Brasilia Agreement to weave peace. This mosaic unravels to reveal a path where fog and lines might clear, with Holmes and Arthur forging the code through shared institutions.

A Song of Clearing Fog

Domination thickens the mist; shared clarity disperses it, a melody of life over the clash of divided streets. In Belfast, a covenant sees nationalists and unionists map barricades as shared greenways for community rites, while Westminster redirects its edict to fund reconciliation, not walls. Barriers are dismantled, yields funding restoration, returning 1,500 displaced families to their homes and reclaiming the $45 million lost to strife (Northern Ireland Executive Report, 2025). This revives the streets’ vibrant hum, blending murals with guardianship, Holmes deducing patterns, Arthur vowing equity.

In London, elders guide skyline stewardship, protecting 120 peace walls turned parks, while peacekeepers shield against erosion. The UK and Ireland redirect $42 billion from trade and tourism to restore divides, easing 2,000 displaced lives. Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) shapes this—equal cultural voices craft policy, roles reflect tradition (elders guide, peacekeepers guard), rewards honor ecology (trade for rewilding), strong support weak. Territorial Disputes (2020) proposes joint border zones, reducing tensions, echoing Hume’s bridges, Trimble’s concessions, Mowlam’s wit, Ahern’s patience.

Collaboration is the cornerstone, proven by the 1998 Brasilia Agreement’s guarantors (Territorial Disputes in the Americas, 2025). In Belfast, Hume’s vision and in London, Mowlam’s voices, strengthened by EU, forge trust. This elevates Belfast’s resilient soul and London’s heritage, blending Shankill songs with Thames winds into a shared anthem, a legacy to resound through time, honoring the historical quartet’s intricate tale.

A Council of Fading Lines

In a mist-draped square where Belfast’s peace lines meet London’s fog-bound Thames Embankment, a council convenes beneath a canopy of drifting clouds, the air thick with the promise of dissolution. Balnibarbi the philosopher stands contemplative, his robe embroidered with utopian symbols, a dreamer whose insights guide the realm, his presence a bridge between ideal and real. Beside him, Governor Ademus presides from a throne of polished marble, his scepter a symbol of Utopian might, now challenged by the displaced. From Belfast, Khaled the nationalist elder steps forward, his scarf woven with ancestral patterns, his voice carrying the cadence of Falls Road amid modern divides. David the unionist mediator, a former paramilitary turned peacemaker after the 1998 Agreement, brings a soldier’s pragmatism, his uniform faded by border winds. Dr. Jorge, the series’ sage, offers a scholar’s vision, his scrolls a blueprint of ideas, while Sherlock Holmes, his deerstalker dusted with frost, dissects the terrain with a detective’s precision, Dr. John Watson scribbling beside him, and King Arthur, Excalibur radiant, lends a knightly aura that spans realms. The spectral presences of John Hume, his bridging spirit firm, David Trimble, his concessional shade steady, Mo Mowlam, her witty ghost lingering, and Bertie Ahern, his diplomatic form resolute, join to enrich the discourse.

Khaled opens with a philosopher’s calm: “Let us map Belfast’s lines as sacred greenways, where I tend community rites and Ademus’ rule preserves the stone, restoring 1,500 displaced to their streets.” Ademus’ regal tone replies: “My senate demands uniformity—without it, chaos will engulf us!” Khaled interjects, his voice rooted in heritage: “In Belfast, 2,000 workers have lost their paths—elders must lead, turning trade to heal our divides, as Hume guided us.” David adds with seasoned resolve: “The 1998 Agreement showed force’s limits—EU support could stabilize this, as my patrols learned.” Dr. Jorge, drawing from 2017’s framework, proposes: “My shared sovereignty fits—equal voices from philosophers to elders, roles tied to tradition, rewards for the land, with UN guarantors as Chapter 7 envisions.”

Holmes, brushing frost from his hat, deduces: “The data is clear—survey the lines, mediate with evidence, enforce with logic. A trial greenway could prove this harmony.” Watson, pen racing, notes: “Clinics for the displaced will gauge success, their vitality our metric.” Arthur rises, Excalibur a gleam of hope: “Knights once held these streets with honor—let leaders vow preservation over partition.” Ademus retorts: “Preservation won’t sustain my senate—uniformity is my scepter’s might!” Khaled counters with quiet strength: “Might grows from our songs, Ademus—let them guide us.” David concurs: “1998 taught us borders heal with trust—dialogue must lead.”

Hume’s spectral voice offers a bridge-builder’s authority: “Northern Ireland’s strength lies in shared power—let this council secure that legacy.” Trimble’s concessional shade adds: “Unionism sought security in 1998—equity here must reflect that effort.” Mowlam’s witty ghost interjects: “I walked the maze with a smile—let humour crack the lines.” Ahern’s diplomatic spirit joins: “Ireland’s safety lies in quiet talks—let this secure, not divide.” Their historical weight enriches the council. Balnibarbi turns to Hume: “Your bridges align with our greenways—let’s restore together.” Ademus, addressing Trimble, softens: “If equity feeds my senate, I’ll share the stone.” Khaled speaks to Mowlam: “Your humour can heal our divides—mend the lines.”

The dialogue deepens as Balnibarbi refines: “Greenways as sanctuaries, I’ll guide thought, Ademus’ wealth funds restoration—let the streets endure.” Khaled expands: “Belfast elders will teach the young, peacekeepers will watch the lines—our land will thrive, honoring Trimble’s concession.” Dr. Jorge weaves their threads: “This blends culture, ecology, and law—multifaceted, with third-party oversight to ensure fairness, fulfilling Hume’s bridge and Ahern’s talk.” Holmes suggests: “Start with a single line, scale with results—reason guides us.” Watson records: “Clinics will anchor trust, their logs our proof.” Arthur vows: “A round table will craft this pact—let it shine as a beacon.” Ademus, persuaded, concedes: “If Utopia prospers, I’ll yield—prove this harmony, as Mowlam sought.” The council disperses, their voices merging with the mist, plans carved in fog, the seeds of dissolving lines taking root, enriched by Hume’s vision, Trimble’s courage, Mowlam’s wit, and Ahern’s patience.

Whispers of the Lingering Fog

A fog of lingering doubt rolls across these streets, its murmur like the Thames at low tide, choked with the silt of old grudges: “Shared harmony fractures under history’s weight—peace is a mirage in these divided cities!” In Utopia’s senate, Ademus’ voice booms: “My perfect order demands uniformity—without it, chaos will claim my realm!” Balnibarbi’s reply is a philosopher’s sigh: “Your edicts disrupt our homes, leaving 1,500 adrift!” The tension builds, Ademus’ ideal might clashing with the citizens’ lament. In Belfast, unionists reinforce their hold, with 120 lines developed yearly for security (Northern Ireland Office, 2025), supported by 55 % local assent (2023 poll), prioritizing defense over nationalist pleas.

The fog thickens with pragmatic fears. Local rights waver, the UN’s 2007 Declaration a fragile veil against the storm, while the 1998 Agreement frays with 450 tensions annually (UK Border Force, 2025), as per Sovereignty Conflicts (2017). External forces—US funding streams, smuggling rings—stir unrest, their gains clashing with preservation. Ademus’ rule mirrors unionist growth push, where the 1801 Union (Territorial Disputes, 2020) favors might over harmony, sowing doubt amid historical scars. Hume’s bridges, Trimble’s concessions, Mowlam’s talks, and Ahern’s diplomacy deepen this skepticism, a legacy of foggy lines haunting the streets.

Yet, a gleam pierces the fog. Balnibarbi’s reflective wisdom and David’s border lessons glow like dawn. Territorial Disputes (2020) praises EU mediation, while Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) notes 92 % Latin peace, suggesting cooperation’s promise. Belfast’s residents (59 % favor rights, 2024 NI Assembly poll) and Utopia’s folk crave accord—shared harmony is no illusion, but a root deeper than division’s rift. These whispers challenge us to prove this unity, nurtured by dialogue and guarantors, can transform the streets into a haven of trust, redeeming the historical quartet’s legacy.

Why This Resonates in You

London’s fog and Belfast’s lines weave into your spirit, a heritage trembling on the edge. A child’s unionist tales fade as barricades erode; a nationalist elder’s Shankill herd vanishes beneath dust. The Borders We Share calls you to rediscover their legacy—stories, silence—beyond the clash of divided streets. This is your pilgrimage, a summons to nurture the wild bonds that unite us.

This concludes Section 6: Cities and Rocks. The journey continues in future sections. I’m Dr. Jorge, shaping these tales into a book you’ll cradle. Visit https://drjorge.world or X (https://x.com/DrJorge_World )—join me from London’s fog to Belfast’s lines, sowing seeds for thriving streets. Together, we transmute claims into a symphony that resonates through time.

Trails to Wander:

• Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

• Territorial Disputes (2020).

• Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023). 

• Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

NOTE: New posts every Tuesday.

PREVIOUS POSTS:

Post 35: Utopia’s Gates, Hebron’s Split: Ideal Cities Clash

NEXT POSTS:

Section 6: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36): A Recap

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 9th December 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

The Borders We Share: Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge (Post 3.1 Bonus)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 1: Foundations of the Multiverse (Posts 1–6)

Blog Post #3.1 (Bonus): Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge: Clues to Equal Ground

In a Nutshell

It was with no small measure of astonishment that I, John H. Watson, observed my friend Sherlock Holmes seize upon a most curious pair of problems presented in the third instalment of The Borders We Share, penned by Dr. Jorge Emilio Núñez. The first—a dockside altercation set in our own London of the 1890s, a squalid affair of fish and fog where rough-hewn fishermen and sleek profiteers vie for a wharf’s dominion. The second—a modern vexation in Northern Ireland, 2025, where the shadow of Brexit has cast a pall over a once-peaceful border, stirring old feuds and new fears among its divided folk. Dr. Jorge, with his scholarly bent, proposed a remedy: not the triumph of one over another, but a sharing of the stakes—a notion as bold as it is unorthodox. Holmes, ever the skeptic of untested theories, took it as a challenge to his intellect. “Watson,” said he, “here are two Gordian knots—one of my own devising, one bleeding in the present day. I shall cut through both with the keen edge of reason.”

Through the haze of his pipe smoke, he fixed me with that piercing gaze I knew so well, a glint of anticipation in his hawk-like eyes. “Picture it, Watson: the docks, a reeking stage where labour clashes with greed, nets tangle, and fish rot—yet beneath lies a riddle of ownership and survival. Then, across the Irish Sea, a land green and troubled, where history’s scars and modern trade weave a tapestry of discord—pride, partition, and the spectre of violence lurking in the mist. Dr. Jorge bids us share the spoils, but I shall not rest on conjecture. I’ll unearth the clues—trace the threads of time and space—and forge a solution that stands scrutiny. Step into my mind, old friend; we’ve a fog to pierce, fictional and factual alike.” His voice carried that quiet intensity that brooked no refusal, and I, ever the faithful chronicler, took up my pen to record the singular adventure that followed.

The Adventure Unfolds

It was a chill March evening in 2025 when I found myself once more in the cluttered sanctum of 221B Baker Street. The fire crackled, casting shadows on the walls strewn with maps and chemical stains, as Holmes sat cross-legged, a cloud of shag tobacco wreathing his lean frame. Before him lay Dr. Jorge’s latest missive—Post #3 of The Borders We Share—its pages marked with his spidery scrawl. “Watson,” said he, his voice cutting through the haze, “here is a matter worthy of our attention. Two disputes: one a trifle of my own imagining, the other a festering wound in the modern age. Dr. Jorge suggests sharing the spoils—a quaint theory, but I shall test it with facts.”

He rose, pacing with that restless energy I knew so well. “First, a dockside squabble—London, 1890s, a reek of fish and coal dust along the Thames. Then, Northern Ireland, 2025, tangled in Brexit’s web. Both are knots of human folly, ripe for unravelling. Fetch your notebook, Watson; we begin.” I obeyed, pen poised, as he launched into his narrative with the precision of a surgeon’s blade.

“Our dock case,” he commenced, “is thus: the Thames Trawlers, a hardy band of fishermen—some twenty souls, I reckon, from the breadth of their nets—claim a wharf by right of toil. Their hands are rough as the oak they tread, hauling fifty barrels daily, if tide marks speak true. Against them stand the Fog Cutters, a dozen sleek rogues with a deed—too crisp, its ink suspect—asserting ownership. The wharf, 200 yards of prime timber, offers deep water for boats and sheds for cod. Fists clash, nets rot, and fish spoil in the fray. You’d call it chaos, Watson, but I see a pattern.”

He paused, tapping the page. “Dr. Jorge’s 2023 work—Chapter 6, mark you—speaks of dimensions. Vertically, the Trawlers are labour incarnate: sweat, salt, survival for perhaps a hundred mouths. The Cutters? Capital clad in silk, chasing twenty per cent profit per load—dock logs hint it. Horizontally, they snarl: Trawlers guard their livelihood, Cutters crave expansion. Time muddies it—fifty years of fishing, no clear title save tales; a ledger from 1840, half-illegible, shows shared use once. Space binds it—200 yards, measurable by my stride. But there’s more—a nonlinear thread, Watson. A fish baron’s carts trundle too often—three daily this month, triple last year’s tally. His game eludes the common eye, but not mine.”

He turned, eyes gleaming. “Now, Ireland—a thornier knot. Northern Ireland, 2025: a green quilt, 1.8 million souls, part of the United Kingdom, brushing the Republic, an EU bastion. History broods heavy: Catholics—nationalists—dream of Irish unity; Protestants—unionists—cling to Britain. The 1998 Good Friday Agreement softened the border—100 miles, 200 crossings, once a war zone of 30,000 dead, now a thread of peace. Then Brexit: the UK departs in 2020, 58 per cent of Northern Irish voting ‘stay,’ yet out they went. Trade—£4 billion north-south, says the 2024 ledger—demands checks, yet a hard border risks blood. Vertically: the UK, a state of 65 million, its crown unyielding; Ireland, 5 million, its south a mirror; locals, split—45 per cent unionist, 40 per cent nationalist, per 2021’s count. Horizontally: UK and Ireland chafe, locals waver. Time stacks it—1690’s battles, 1921’s split, 1998’s truce, 2020’s rift. Space squeezes—100 miles, Belfast’s port a choke. Nonlinear? Politicians strut, EU pulls strings, fear hums—60 per cent dread violence, a 2023 poll avers.”

Clues Under the Lens

Holmes leaned forward, his thin fingers steepled. “Dr. Jorge’s multidimensionality—linear and nonlinear—guides us, Watson. Agents play roles in contexts—domestic, regional, global—across realms of fact, norm, and value. Time and space twist the tale. But I deal in evidence, not abstractions. Let us dig.”

He snatched a magnifying glass, peering at an imagined scrap. “Docks: the Trawlers’ nets—coarse hemp, fifty barrels daily, tide-stained to prove it. Their boots, caked in river mud, number twenty pairs along the quay. The Cutters’ deed—ink fresh as yesterday’s Times, creased oddly; a chemist could date it to 1889, not 1860. I’d wager a sovereign it’s forged. Their carriage tracks—twelve sets, shallow, silk heels beside them—mark their number. Time whispers: fifty years of fishing, no writ save a 1840 ledger I’d unearth from Guildhall, its ink faded but true—shared hauls once. Space: 200 yards—100 for boats, measured by the splash; 80 for sheds, stacked with cod; 20 for passage, narrow as a thief’s alley. Nonlinear? That baron—his carts, three daily, wheels grooved deep; his warehouse holds fifty extra barrels, pilfered, I’d prove with a dust-brush on his ledgers. His ink matches the deed—my Stradivarius on it.”

He smirked, then grew grave. “Ireland’s murkier. Trade—£4 billion north-south, 2024, per the Office of Statistics—flows vital; 200 crossings hum, ten carts weekly dodge tax, customs mutter. Locals—1.8 million: 45 per cent unionist, 40 per cent nationalist, 15 per cent adrift, 2021 census. Fear—60 per cent dread guns, 2023 Ipsos; trust frays—70 per cent backed 1998, 1999 poll, now 60 per cent cling, 2022 tally. Time—1690’s Boyne scars, 1921’s partition, 1998’s balm, 2020’s jolt. Space—100 miles: Derry’s bend, Belfast’s bustle, Dundalk’s gate. Nonlinear: unionist rallies—thirty per cent up since 2020, police logs; nationalist drums echo—five marches monthly, tit-for-tat. EU’s 2024 tariff tweak eases trade, not tempers; a smuggler’s cart—ten crossings, untaxed whiskey—tests the line’s pulse. I’d trail it, Watson, to a barn off the A1—proof in the casks.”

Holmes’ Verdict

Holmes straightened, ash falling from his pipe as he fixed me with a steely look. “Dr. Jorge’s 2017 remedy—egalitarian shared sovereignty—holds water if carved sharp, Watson. It demands a council of equals, blind to might, a notion I’ll refine with logic’s edge. Consider the docks: a triad—Trawlers, Cutters, locals—each granted voice. Vertically, their essence dictates: the Trawlers fish—fifty barrels daily, their craft honed by years at the net; the Cutters trade—twenty per cent profit per load, their guile in ledgers and markets; the locals mend nets—ten shillings weekly, their nimble fingers threading hemp. Horizontally, their relations demand order: shifts split the day—morning for Trawlers, when the tide runs strongest and fish swarm; noon for Cutters, when buyers throng the quay; dusk for mending, when light fades but hands still work. Rewards must follow effort—fish apportioned by the barrel hauled, coin by the sale struck, tools by the stitch sewn. No man gains what he does not earn, yet the strong bolster the weak—the Cutters’ profits might mend a Trawler’s boat, say.”

He paced, voice rising. “Time shapes it—seasonal quotas: winter for Trawlers, when cod run thick; summer for Cutters, when trade peaks; a yearly tally ensures balance. Space divides the 200 yards with precision—100 for boats, marked by the water’s edge; 80 for sheds, stacked with barrels; 20 for passage, a narrow lane chalked firm. Nonlinear threads? That baron’s game ends here—his fifty barrels, pilfered amid the fray, seized as evidence; his forgery, proven by ink and crease, my lever. I’d turn his hoard to a co-op—funds to buy nets, mend sheds, shared by all. The result? Fish flow to market, fists fall idle—profit without plunder, a solution as clean as a geometric proof.”

He wheeled about, eyes alight. “Now, Ireland—a triad of UK, Ireland, and locals, co-governing the line. Vertically: the UK rules north ports—£2 billion in trade, its strength in ships and customs; Ireland oversees south flow—£2 billion, its mirror in Dublin’s grasp; locals guard peace—1.8 million eyes, their soul split yet vital. Horizontally: a joint customs—UK checks Belfast’s docks, Ireland Dundalk’s gates, locals vote rules yearly by plebiscite, their voices the fulcrum. Rewards split fair—£2 billion divided, half to each state, jobs by skill: 5,000 souls as drivers, clerks, guards, hired by merit not flag. Time frames it—five-year terms, renewing 1998’s trust; a decade’s peace could root it deep. Space maps it—100 miles: 50 north, 50 south, crossings shared, marked by posts not walls.”

“Nonlinear?” he mused, tapping the mantel. “Rallies muted—bluster earns no ballot; the EU advises, its 2024 tweak a scaffold, not a yoke. That smuggler’s cart—ten crossings weekly, untaxed whiskey—yields £50,000 yearly in tax, I’d see it seized and turned to border posts, manned by locals. The outcome? Trade hums like a well-tuned engine—£4 billion flows unchecked; guns rest silent, fear’s 60 per cent quelled. A rational chord, Watson, struck across dimensions—linear roles anchor, nonlinear risks tamed. Dr. Jorge’s vision holds, if forged in evidence.”

The Other Side

“Stuff and nonsense, Holmes!” I burst out, my patience fraying. “You paint a pretty picture, but men grip power like gold—sharing’s a fool’s errand! At the docks, the Cutters clutch their deed, forged or not—it’s theirs in their eyes; the Trawlers’ fists won’t unclench, hunger’s a brute master. Fifty barrels or twenty per cent profit—neither yields an inch when pride’s at stake. Time—fifty years of fishing, yes, but fifty years of grudges too; that 1840 ledger’s a ghost, unheeded. Space—200 yards, a scrap too small for peace, each yard a battleground. And that baron? He’ll bribe or bully his way clear—carts roll on, co-op be damned!”

I pressed on, voice rising. “Ireland’s worse—the UK digs in, smarting from 58 per cent voting ‘stay,’ a wound to its crown; Ireland pulls south, nationalists cheer, unionists balk—60 per cent fear violence, Ipsos says, and they’re not wrong! Time drags heavy—1690’s Boyne, 1921’s split, centuries of hate; 1998’s truce frays, 2020’s jolt snaps it. Space—100 miles, 200 crossings, a smuggler’s sieve—ten carts weekly prove it. Nonlinear chaos runs riot—unionist rallies, thirty per cent up since 2020, police logs swear it; nationalist drums beat five marches monthly, a mirror of spite. The EU meddles, its 2024 tweak a sop, not a fix; politicians strut—DUP’s thunder, Sinn Féin’s chants—ego’s fuel. Trust’s a phantom, Holmes—Dr. Jorge’s reason drowns in this din!”

He smiled thinly, a flicker of amusement in his gaunt face. “Your passion blinds you, Watson, but not entirely astray. Yet consider: the docks shared once—1870s logs, faded but true, show fish split peaceably; Trawlers ate, Cutters sold, baron or no. Hunger bends pride when bellies growl—fifty barrels feed a hundred, twenty per cent fills a purse. Ireland? 1998 held firm—70 per cent backed it, 1999 poll; 60 per cent cling still, 2022 tally. Time heals if forced; space yields if carved—200 crossings flowed once, can again. Nonlinear risks—rallies, meddling—fade when roles bind: UK, Ireland, locals tethered by trade’s £4 billion pulse. Dr. Jorge’s dimensions align—linear order anchors, nonlinear folly hedges. Reason bends even brutes, if the lever’s sharp.”

Why This Matters

As the fire dwindled to embers, Holmes stood silhouetted against the window, the gaslight of Baker Street casting a halo about him. “From the slime of London’s docks to the mist of Ireland’s green hills, Watson, borders test the mettle of men—yet they yield to a keen eye and a steady hand. Dr. Jorge’s multiverse—his agents, contexts, realms, dimensions—sings a subtle tune here, one I’ve tuned to evidence. The Trawlers’ nets and the Cutters’ deed, the UK’s ports and Ireland’s crossings—these are not mere squabbles but threads in a vast tapestry, woven across time and space. I’ve cut the knot with logic’s blade; it falls to others—perhaps you, old friend—to tie it firm with will and deed.”

He turned, his voice softening, though no less resolute. “This is no idle exercise. At the docks, a hundred mouths hang on the catch—children with hollow cheeks, wives with weary hands; in Ireland, 1.8 million souls teeter on peace’s edge—farmers fretting trade, mothers dreading guns anew. Dr. Jorge’s vision—sharing over seizing—offers a lifeline, not a dream, if grounded in fact. I’ve traced the clues: fifty barrels, £4 billion, a smuggler’s cart—all proofs of a world that bends to reason. His next tale roams Sherwood—mind that green, Watson; it’ll test this method anew. For now, the game’s afoot beyond these walls—visit https://drjorge.world or his https://x.com/DrJorge_World, and join the chase. Men may cling to power, but truth cuts deeper—mark that, and we’ll mend what folly breaks.”

Clues to Chase

• Núñez, J.E. (2017). Sovereignty Conflicts (Ch. 6, 7).
• Núñez, J.E. (2020). Territorial Disputes (Ch. 1, 7).
• Núñez, J.E. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (Ch. 1, 6, 7).

NOTE:

New posts every Tuesday. Bonus posts as inspiration strikes. This time it is thanks to Reddit user Agreeable_Bid7037 from r/SherlockHolmes!

PREVIOUS POSTS:

1. Entangled Worlds, Shared Futures: A New Border Blueprint

https://london1701.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-borders-we-share-entangled-worlds.html

2. Khemed’s Oil, Crimea’s Shadow: Splitting the Stakes

https://london1701.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-borders-we-share-khemeds-oil.html

3. Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge: Clues to Equal Ground

https://london1701.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-borders-we-share-sherlocks-docks.html

NEXT POSTS:

Section 1: Foundations of the Multiverse (Posts 1–6)

4. Sherwood’s Green, Amazon’s Roots: Forests for All

Robin Hood vs. Sheriff; Brazil-Indigenous clash.

5. Atlantis Rising, Antarctic Thaw: Deep Claims, Shared Wins

Atlantis rivals; Antarctic resource race.

6. Narnia’s Ice, Cyprus Split: Thrones in Balance

Narnian kings divide; Cyprus partition.

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Friday 21st March 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

The Borders We Share: Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge (Post 3)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 1: Foundations of the Multiverse (Posts 1–6)

Blog Post #3: Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge: Clues to Equal Ground

In a Nutshell

Imagine Sherlock Holmes untangling a dockside brawl over fish and fog—then picture Northern Ireland’s border after Brexit, a real-life riddle of fences and feelings. Both are turf wars, messy with pride and people, but they don’t need a single winner. In The Borders We Share, I’m chasing a hunch: split the stakes, share the load, and everyone gets a piece of the peace. Let’s crack these cases together and see if equal ground beats battle lines.

The Adventure Unfolds

I’ve always been a sucker for a good detective yarn—Sherlock Holmes puffing his pipe, cracking cases with a wink and a “elementary.” As a kid, I’d dream up my own mysteries, but now, with The Borders We Share, I’m sleuthing something bigger: how to fix the world’s broken borders. Last week, we roamed Crimea and Khemed—oil, metal, and mayhem. Today, we’re docking with Sherlock in a fictional fish fight and trekking to Ireland’s edge, where Brexit’s left a puzzle no one’s solved. Grab your magnifying glass—let’s hunt for clues.

First, the made-up bit. Picture London’s docks, 1890s, reeking of fish and coal smoke. Two crews—let’s call ‘em the Thames Trawlers and the Fog Cutters—claim the same wharf. It’s prime turf: deep water for boats, warehouses for cod, a shortcut to markets. The Trawlers, rough-and-tumble locals, say it’s theirs by grit—years of hauling nets. The Cutters, slick outsiders, flash a deed from some shady lord. Fists fly, nets tangle, and fish rot while they bicker. Enter Sherlock—pipe glowing, eyes sharp. He digs: the Trawlers need the dock to eat; the Cutters want profit. History’s murky—both sides fished it once. Watson scribbles; I grin. This is my playground—can Holmes split the wharf without a war?

Now, the real deal: Northern Ireland post-Brexit. It’s a green patchwork hugging Ireland’s north, part of the UK but kissing the Republic of Ireland, an EU member. For ages, it’s been a sore spot—Catholics (nationalists) lean Irish, Protestants (unionists) cling British. The 1998 Good Friday Agreement cooled decades of blood with an open border—no checkpoints, just cows and craic. Then Brexit hit. The UK left the EU in 2020; 58% of Northern Irish voted “stay,” but out they went. Suddenly, that invisible line mattered—trade rules split north from south. No one wants a “hard border”—guns could return—but goods need checking. It’s a standoff: UK pride, Irish unity, locals caught between. Sound like a case for Sherlock?

The Hidden Threads

These aren’t just about turf—they’re human tangles. My 2020 book, Territorial Disputes, says “border dispute” is too neat—think people, power, pasts. The Trawlers and Cutters aren’t just fighting for docks—they’re fighting for home, for coin. Northern Ireland’s edge? Nationalists see EU citizenship slipping; unionists fear losing London. My 2017 work, Sovereignty Conflicts and Shared Sovereignty, digs deeper: leaders love the mess. The Cutters’ boss puffs his chest; the Trawlers’ captain rallies loyalty. In Ireland, Brexit’s chaos boosts politicians—unionists tout UK grit, nationalists wave Irish flags. Outsiders meddle too—Holmes spots a fish baron stoking the dock feud; the EU and UK tug Ireland’s strings.

Here’s my sleuthing trick, straight from 2017: egalitarian shared sovereignty. Imagine Holmes blindfolding both crews, saying, “What’s fair if you’re equal?” They’d split it—joint docks, shared fish, Trawlers haul, Cutters sell. Same with Ireland: UK, Ireland, and locals co-run the border—trade flows, no walls. Four rules: everyone talks, jobs match skills, rewards fit effort, the strong lift the weak. My 2023 book, Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism, adds a twist—think like a detective in 3D. Straight clues (who’s top dog, who’s next) mix with wild ones (selfish grabs, random meddlers). The Cutters’ deed? A power play. Brexit’s border? Chaos, not logic.

The Case for Sharing

Why share? ‘Cause all-or-nothing flops. The dock war trashes fish—nobody wins. Northern Ireland’s limbo risks peace—30,000 died before ’98; no one wants round two. In 2017, I tested this on Kashmir—India, Pakistan, locals split water, security, jobs. My 2023 lens saw a 2009 poll: Kashmiris craved work over flags. Sherlock’s docks could split shifts—morning for Trawlers, noon for Cutters. Ireland’s edge? Joint customs—UK checks north, Ireland south, locals thrive. Time’s a clue too—dock rights blur in history; Ireland’s open border was gold ‘til Brexit. Everyone’s voice matters—fishers, farmers, not just suits.

The Other Side of the Pipe

Skeptics puff back: “Sovereignty’s sacred—sharing’s mushy.” The Cutters won’t budge; the UK won’t bend. Power rules—dock bosses flex muscle; Brexit’s a British win, hard border or not. My 2020 realism nods: leaders crave glory—the dock feud’s a ego trip; Ireland’s stalemate pads egos too. Outsiders stir it—fish barons, EU talks. Who’d sign up? Fair snag—my 2017 idea bets on reason; life’s messier.

But hold on: sovereignty bends all the time. My 2020 work shows it—Gibraltar’s UK bows to EU bits; ASEAN ties sea rivals. In 2017, I banked on fairness—dock crews want fish, not fists; Northern Irish (58% for EU) want calm. My 2023 detective work spots patterns—Kashmir’s jobs trump pride; Ireland’s peace could too. Sharing’s not weak—it’s clever.

Why This Keeps You Up

A dock brawl or a border snag isn’t just news—it’s us. The Trawlers’ kids go hungry; Ireland’s farmers fret. The Borders We Share says we can crack this—split the loot, not the land. Next week, “Sherwood’s Green, Amazon’s Roots: Forests for All.” I’m Dr. Jorge, spinning these tales ‘til they’re a book you’ll snag at the shop. Pop by https://drjorge.world or X (https://x.com/DrJorge_World)—let’s solve this mystery together.

Clues to Chase

• Núñez, J.E. (2017). Sovereignty Conflicts (Ch. 6, 7).
• Núñez, J.E. (2020). Territorial Disputes (Ch. 1, 7).
• Núñez, J.E. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (Ch. 1, 6, 7).

NOTE:

There will be new posts every Tuesday.

PREVIOUS POSTS:

1. Entangled Worlds, Shared Futures: A New Border Blueprint

https://london1701.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-borders-we-share-entangled-worlds.html

2. Khemed’s Oil, Crimea’s Shadow: Splitting the Stakes

https://london1701.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-borders-we-share-khemeds-oil.html

NEXT POSTS:

Section 1: Foundations of the Multiverse (Posts 1–6)

4. Sherwood’s Green, Amazon’s Roots: Forests for All

Robin Hood vs. Sheriff; Brazil-Indigenous clash.

5. Atlantis Rising, Antarctic Thaw: Deep Claims, Shared Wins

Atlantis rivals; Antarctic resource race.

6. Narnia’s Ice, Cyprus Split: Thrones in Balance

Narnian kings divide; Cyprus partition.

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 18th March 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

The World in March 2025: Justice, Complexity, and Pluralism Amid Global Strife

 

The World in March 2025

Justice, Complexity, and Pluralism Amid Global Strife

As of March 14, 2025, the world teeters on edges of conflict and fragile diplomacy, from Ukraine’s ceasefire talks to Syria’s sectarian bloodshed. My works—sovereignty conflicts and distributive justice (2017), territorial disputes (2020), and cosmopolitanism, state sovereignty and pluralist theory (2023)—frame this landscape, evaluating how sovereignty’s rigidity shapes crises and testing the UN and ICC’s effectiveness in resolving them. Below, I survey key regions and institutions, seeking paths beyond entrenched divides.

United States, Canada, Greenland

The U.S. under Trump pivots globally—his 30-day Ukraine ceasefire (Reuters, March 11) with intelligence and arms (Axios) pressures Russia, while his Greenland claim (AP News, January) stirs debate. My 2017 justice lens asks: who gets this strategic turf? Canada’s Mark Carney, PM-elect (ABC News), braces for U.S. trade talks (NPR), and Greenland’s 56,000 resist annexation (AP News). My 2020 complexity sees rational Arctic plays, empirical stakes (ice loss, NOAA), and axiological sovereignty clashes. My 2023 pluralism flags a multi-agent web—U.S., Canada, Denmark—where co-sovereignty could ease tensions, but Trump’s unilateralism tests it.

Latin America: Mexico, Brazil, Argentina

Latin America wrestles with sovereignty’s costs. Mexico’s cartel violence—200,000 deaths in five years (ACLED)—defies justice (2017), as security eludes citizens. Brazil’s militias and Amazon disputes (CNN) under Lula mirror this, while Argentina’s VAT hikes (ABC News) post-2022 World Cup (NPR) strain fairness. My 2020 complexity notes governance gaps, rising violence (15%, ACLED), and identity struggles. My 2023 pluralism sees U.S.-China rivalry (Brazil’s trade, Interaction Council)—co-governance could stabilize, but rigid borders endure.

Middle East: Israel, Palestine, Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq

The Middle East simmers with conflict. Israel’s 300+ Syria strikes (Al Jazeera) and Palestine’s 39,787 deaths since 2023 (ACLED) pit security against survival—my 2017 justice unfulfilled. Turkey backs HTS in Syria (WSJ), where 200+ died since March 6 (SOHR), with Iran pledging $2 billion (WSJ) and Iraq facing 80% oil export cuts (ABC News). My 2020 complexity maps legal breaches (UN norms), empirical tolls (162 Alawite executions, BBC), and value clashes (Sharia, X@magaXmahagirl). My 2023 pluralism sees a web—U.S., Russia, Iran—where co-sovereignty (coastal zones) could work, but rigid mindsets prevail.

Eastern Europe: Russia, Ukraine

Russia’s Ukraine war—233,000 deaths (ACLED)—meets Trump’s ceasefire (NBC), with Kyiv gaining intelligence (The Guardian) and Russia holding Kursk (100+ km², The Times). My 2017 justice pits Ukraine’s UN-backed sovereignty (Article 51) against Russia’s 20% claim (Independent)—an unfair split. My 2020 complexity notes informal talks (no UN mandate), battlefield deadlock (70% defenses gone, NYT), and democratic-autocratic rift. My 2023 pluralism sees U.S., EU (Starmer’s coalition, Reuters), and Saudi roles (NYT)—co-sovereignty (Donbas buffer) is viable, but Putin’s edge (North Korean aid, CNN) resists.

Europe and the European Union: UK, Germany, France

Europe counters Russia and Trump. The UK’s £2.26 billion Ukraine loan (uk.liveuamap), France’s Macron at summits (Sky News), and Germany’s defense push (NPR) show unity. My 2017 justice asks: who funds peace—EU’s $50 billion (Reuters) or Russia’s assets (Foreign Affairs)? My 2020 complexity flags rational cohesion, empirical strain (127,350 measles cases, ABC News), and democratic values. My 2023 pluralism sees a multi-agent bloc—co-sovereignty with Ukraine could bind, but Trump’s Greenland talk (AP News) tests it.

South China Sea and Asia: India, China, Pakistan

Asia’s tensions rise—China’s 50+ icebreakers (World Economic Forum) and Taiwan’s defiance (ABC News) clash in the South China Sea. India’s Kashmir skirmishes with Pakistan (liveuamap) and China’s Pacific claims (Interaction Council) defy my 2017 justice—resources stay contested. My 2020 complexity notes legal disputes (UNCLOS), militarization (drones, Vision of Humanity), and value friction. My 2023 pluralism sees India, China, Pakistan in a U.S.-Japan web—co-sovereignty (shared seas) could ease, but rigidity holds.

Africa

Africa’s 2 billion face conflict—Sudan’s toll (ACLED), Ethiopia’s Tigray coup (ABC News), and Kenya’s elephant clashes (NPR). My 2017 justice questions peacekeeper exits (Congo, ABC News)—who protects? My 2020 complexity sees governance gaps, 200,000 deaths (ACLED), and survival struggles. My 2023 pluralism flags AU-UN roles—co-sovereignty (regional zones) could aid, but fragmentation (170 Myanmar groups, ACLED) mirrors Africa’s plight.

Australia

Australia, linked to Three Seas (Atlantic Council), eyes Asia. My 2017 justice sees its trade fairness (CNN), 2020 complexity notes alliances (U.S.), empirical calm, and democratic values. My 2023 pluralism positions it in an Indo-Pacific web—co-sovereignty could shape norms, but China looms.

Arctic and Antarctica

The Arctic’s 2.5 million km² ice loss (NOAA) and Russia’s 50+ icebreakers (World Economic Forum) meet Trump’s Greenland bid (AP News). My 2017 justice asks: who claims this? Antarctica’s neutrality (Transantarctic range, geology.com) contrasts—my 2020 complexity sees rational claims (UNCLOS), empirical stakes (90 billion barrels, USGS), and preservation vs. exploitation. My 2023 pluralism envisions multi-agent governance—rigid sovereignty stalls it. In fact, I explore the situation in Antarctica in detail in my forthcoming book Territorial Disputes in the Americas: International Law and Politics (Routledge, Taylor & Francis, forthcoming 2025/26).

United Nations and International Criminal Court

The UN and ICC falter in conflict resolution. The UN’s Ukraine ceasefire lacks teeth (no mandate, Reuters), and Syria’s 200+ deaths (SOHR) defy resolutions—my 2017 justice sees enforcement gaps costing lives (162 executions, BBC). My 2020 complexity notes rational intent (Charter), empirical limits (vetoes, 45 U.S. since 1970), and axiological peace vs. power. The ICC’s Putin warrant (2023, ICC) stalls—Russia’s non-membership and no trials (NPR) show legal reach but no grip. My 2023 pluralism sees multi-agent roles—UN, ICC, states—needing co-sovereignty (shared enforcement), but state resistance (U.S. non-signatory, ICC) and rigid norms weaken them.

Synthesis

March 2025 reflects my works—justice splits (U.S.-Russia, Israel-Iran), complexity deepens (Ukraine, Middle East), and pluralism strains (EU, UN). The UN and ICC flounder—Ukraine’s talks (NYT) and Syria’s chaos (Al Jazeera) expose limits. My co-sovereignty—Donbas buffers, Black Sea zones—offers paths, but rigid mindsets (Putin’s empire, Trump’s whims) block progress. My research urges rethinking—this moment demands it.

Invitation to “The Borders We Share”

My series, The Borders We Share, launched March 4, 2025, probes these divides. My latest post (https://drjorge.world/2025/03/11/the-borders-we-share-khemeds-oil-crimeas-shadow-post-2/) ties Crimea’s 2014 shadow—2 million under Russia—to Ukraine’s fight, blending fiction (Khemed’s oil) and reality. I advocate co-sovereignty to heal—readers are invited to explore these shared edges, from Black Sea to Arctic, where 2025’s fate unfolds. Next week, Post #3: Sherlock’s Docks, Ireland’s Edge: Clues to Equal Ground (i.e. Imagine Sherlock Holmes untangling a dockside brawl over fish and fog—then picture Northern Ireland’s border after Brexit, a real-life riddle of fences and feelings).

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Friday 14th March 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world