Wednesday, 25 March 2026

Running 21km for Children & Community: Please Support Our Great Manchester Run!

 

Running 21km for Children & Community: Please Support Our Great Manchester Run!

 

Dear friends, family and colleagues,

I’m excited to share some big news: On Sunday, 31 May 2026, my friend Jose Antonio (from Equatorial Guinea) and I, Jorge (from Argentina), will be taking on the AJ Bell Great Manchester Run Half Marathon — that's the full 21.1 km through the vibrant streets of Manchester!




We’re both incredibly motivated and training hard because every step we take will support three very meaningful charities. All funds we raise will be split equally among them, going directly to help:

  1. Fundação Angelica Goulart (Brazil) — Providing education, care, and opportunities to children and teenagers living in situations of social vulnerability in Pedra de Guaratiba, Rio de Janeiro.
    https://www.fundacaoangelicagoulart.org.br/




  1. Manchester Deaf Centre (UK) — A welcoming hub right in Manchester where Deaf and hard-of-hearing people connect through social events, BSL classes, wellbeing groups, a Sign Language Choir, Job Club, Youth Group, and much more.
    https://www.manchesterdeafcentre.com/



  1. SOS Children’s Villages, Aldeas Infantiles in Spanish (Spain) — Working tirelessly to protect and improve the lives of children and young people without parental care or at serious risk of losing it, giving them a safe home and a brighter future.
    https://www.sos-childrensvillages.org/where-we-help/europe/spain

This run is more than a personal challenge — it's our way of bringing together people from different continents to create real, positive change for vulnerable children, youth, and communities.

If you’d like to support us (every donation, big or small, makes a difference!):

Your encouragement and generosity would mean the world to us — and even more to the children and people these organisations help every day.

Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for any support you can give. We’ll keep you updated on our training journey!

With gratitude and best wishes,

Jorge (Argentina) and Jose Antonio (Equatorial Guinea)

https://drjorge.world/


Tuesday, 10 March 2026

The Borders We Share: Bonus Post: A Tapestry of Shared Horizons – Summing Up Sections 1–7

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

The wind today is gentle, carrying the memory of every frontier we have walked together.

When I began The Borders We Share in early 2025, the aim was simple yet ambitious: to reimagine over 200 real-world territorial disputes—places where history, power, and people collide—through the lens of fiction, myth, and egalitarian shared sovereignty. The series asks a single, persistent question: what if we stopped treating borders as lines that divide and began to see them as threads that can be rewoven? What if the stories we tell about land—whether drawn from Jonathan Swift, C.S. Lewis, Robert E. Howard, L. Frank Baum, or Samuel Butler—could illuminate paths toward justice in Crimea, the South China Sea, the Amazon, Western Sahara, the Golan Heights, Kashmir, the Falklands/Malvinas, the Indus, the Nile, and countless other contested places?

Over seven sections and more than forty posts, we have travelled from the foundational multiverse of early tales to the arid heart of deserts and plains. Along the way, Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson, King Arthur, Robin Hood, Conan, the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodman, Talking Beasts, and many others have walked beside real voices—Sahrawi refugees, Kazakh herders, Bedouin elders, Dinka cattlemen, Arrernte song-keepers, Warlpiri women, Indigenous custodians, and countless others. Each pairing has served as a mirror: fiction reflecting reality, reality refracting fiction, until the boundary between the two becomes as porous as wind-blown sand.

The series is built on four scholarly anchors:

  • Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) – the triadic framework of claimant A, claimant B, and populated territory C, where C is too often treated as scenery.
  • Territorial Disputes (2020) – the sociological fractures, prestige payoffs, and multilayered realities that keep disputes alive.
  • Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023) – the moral demand that no resident be treated as a means only.
  • Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) – the practical success of guarantor-led zones and shared-sovereignty mechanisms that have achieved high durability in the Americas.

These works are not mere background; they are the quiet heartbeat of every council, every accord, every proposal to share rather than seize.

Section 1: Foundations of the Multiverse (Posts 1–6)

We began with the building blocks: how fiction and reality can speak to each other across time. Early posts introduced the series’ method—pairing iconic fictional territories with contemporary disputes—and laid out the core vision of egalitarian shared sovereignty. From Tintin’s Khemed echoing Crimea’s annexation to early entanglements of myth and map, Section 1 established that borders are not only lines on paper but stories we tell about belonging, exclusion, and possibility. The aim was already clear: reframe disputes not as zero-sum contests but as opportunities for creative, equitable coexistence.

Section 2: Oil and Dust Disputes (Posts 7–12)

The journey moved into the gritty terrain of resource extraction. Oil fields, dust storms, and the curse of black gold became central motifs. Posts paired fictional oil-soaked lands with real disputes over hydrocarbons and minerals. The accords here began to take shape: revenue sharing, local consultation, environmental safeguards, and residency pathways that recognize contribution over conquest. Section 2 showed how wealth beneath the ground can either poison relations or—through transparent, inclusive mechanisms—become a shared foundation.

Section 3: Tides of Claim – Six Tales of Islands and Ambition (Posts 13–18)

Islands and ambition formed the heart of Section 3. We explored insular disputes—places where land is surrounded by sea, and sovereignty is measured in square kilometres of rock and reef. Fictional islands mirrored real archipelagos and atolls. The section deepened the series’ focus on the human cost of isolation: displaced families, lost livelihoods, militarized reefs. Councils emphasized joint management, demilitarization zones, and cultural preservation—ideas drawn from successful island-sharing precedents.

Section 4: Forests and Lands (Posts 19–24)

Forests and lands brought us into lush, contested green. We paired mythic woodlands with real tropical and temperate forests under pressure from logging, agriculture, and Indigenous dispossession. The accords here focused on ecological corridors, Indigenous guardianship, and revenue sharing from sustainable use. Section 4 highlighted how forests are not just timber but living libraries of memory and biodiversity, and how their fate is tied to the rights of those who have tended them for generations.

Section 5: Mountains and Heights (Posts 25–30)

Mountains and heights lifted us to the vertical. We climbed contested peaks, border ridges, and high plateaus. Fictional summits met real ranges where altitude becomes a strategic asset. Councils proposed shared mountaineering zones, transboundary conservation, and residency pathways for high-altitude communities. Section 5 showed how the thin air of high places can either separate people or—through joint stewardship—remind them of their common vulnerability to weather, climate, and gravity.

Section 6: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36)

Cities and rocks brought us into the built environment. We walked contested urban stones—from Jerusalem’s walls to Berlin’s ghosts, from Dubai’s towers to Hebron’s welded shutters. The accords here emphasized shared municipal governance, heritage protection, residency rights, and naming of workers who built the skylines. Section 6 revealed how cities, like deserts, can exclude as much as they include, and how shared sovereignty can turn concrete barriers into bridges.

Section 7: Deserts and Plains (Posts 37–42)

Deserts and plains formed the arid heart of the series so far. We traversed Laputa’s Waste and the Sahara, Cimmeria’s flats and the Eurasian steppe, Erewhon’s plateau and Sinai, Narnia’s southern desert and Sudan–South Sudan wastes, Oz’s meadows and the Australian Outback, and returned to the now-entangled dunes of Laputa and the Sahara. Councils proposed shared commissions, aquifer recharge, soil regeneration, residency pathways, and transparency rules. Section 7 showed that even in the harshest places, where life is measured in drops of water and blades of grass, shared stewardship can create sufficiency from scarcity.

The Borders We Share is not about erasing borders; it is about reimagining them. The series asks: what if we treated every contested place—whether mythic island, sacred mountain, oil-rich desert, or urban stone—as a shared home rather than a prize? What if sovereignty were not a zero-sum game but a tapestry woven from equal voices, traditional knowledge, ecological care, and transparent justice?

Over seven sections we have seen that disputes are not inevitable. They are choices—choices about who counts, who speaks, who benefits, who remembers. The accords proposed so far—joint commissions, residency pathways, ecological corridors, veto rights, transparent naming—offer a different choice: one where no one is scenery, no one is ballast, and no one is erased.

The journey is not finished. Section 8: Rivers and Flows (Posts 43–48) begin soon. We will follow water—life’s most intimate border—through Sherwood’s streams and the Nile, Laputa’s falls and the Mekong, Utopia’s banks and the Indus, Ruritania’s tides and the Danube, Narnia’s run and the Euphrates, and Cimmeria’s flood and the Amur. Rivers do not respect lines drawn on maps; they carve new paths, carry memory, sustain life. They remind us that borders are not fixed—they flow, they bend, they can be shared.Until then, the ground beneath us is still listening.

I remain, as always,

Dr. Jorge

https://drjorge.world

Trails to Wander:

• Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

• Territorial Disputes (2020).

• Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023). 

• Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

New posts every Tuesday. Next post will be available on Tuesday 31st March 2026.

Section 7 Recap: Deserts and Plains (Posts 37–42)


Section 8: Rivers and Flows (Posts 43–48)

43, Sherwood’s Stream, Nile’s Flow: Green to Blue

44, Laputa’s Falls, Mekong’s Rush: Sky to Stream

45, Utopia’s Banks, Indus’ Bend: Perfect Waters

46, Ruritania’s Tide, Danube’s Dance: Crowns of Current

47, Narnia’s Run, Euphrates’ End: Royal Rivers

48, Cimmeria’s Flood, Amur’s Edge: Dust Washes East

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 10th March 2026

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

Monday, 2 March 2026

2026 Events: Workshops, Congress Sessions & Book Presentations

 

Content

a) 20 March 2026, Madrid, Spain

b) 14 May 2026, Makati City, Philippines

c) 18 June 2026, Paris, France

d) 28 June – 3 July 2026, Istanbul, Turkey

e)13-14 July 2026, Athens, Greece

1. Upcoming events




Expert talk at the PROTECT Conference: Doing Business Amidst  New Threats

Agenda: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11uXx-AAeLpbNA-0XtHIW5ku_2otupxOP/view

My Session: Territorial Disputes: Geopolitical Tensions, Global Volatility, and Business
Positioning
This session examines the rise in territorial conflicts and the forces shaping modern economies. We will discuss how policy choices and market forces influence the global landscape, as well as the strategic implications for national policies, enterprise systems, and the development of physical assets. Additionally, discussions will cover market policies regarding homeland sufficiency and maintaining comparative advantages in forest, agricultural, marine, and mineral resources. Finally, we will address the shift from cyclical to structural volatility and how businesses can build resilience across finance, operations, and strategy.


Link: https://ivr2026istanbul.org/special-workshop/sw06-multidimensionality-intersectionality-and-internormativity-jorge-e-nunez-gabriel-encinas/

Link: https://ivr2026istanbul.org/special-workshop/sw07-gods-sovereignty-territorial-disputes-and-multidimensionality-jorge-e-nunez/



Workshop Overview

This 2-day intensive workshop offers a unique opportunity to explore the legal and political dimensions of territorial disputes and sovereignty conflicts in the 21st century. Participants will engage with real-world case studies—from the Arctic to the South China Sea—and develop a nuanced understanding of international law, dispute resolution mechanisms, and geopolitical dynamics.

The workshop will be held onsite in Athens, one of the world’s most historic and accessible cities, and will be followed by two online Q&A sessions to deepen learning and maintain global engagement.

Further details:

https://drjorge.world/2025/10/30/introduction-to-territorial-disputes-and-sovereignty-conflicts-international-law-and-politics-athens-july-2026/

2. Latest Monograph: Territorial Disputes in the Americas



Your Guide to Law, Geopolitics, and More

Want to master the law and geopolitics of territorial disputes? Curious about why leaders like Obama, Trump, Maduro, and Milei act as they do? Eager to explore what’s at stake in Greenland, the Amazon, the Mexico–United States border, Antarctica, or indigenous peoples’ struggles? Territorial Disputes in the Americas, launching August 20, 2025, is your book (pre-sales via Amazon and Routledge now)! This groundbreaking work uses a multidimensional approach to decode the complex conflicts shaping our continent. Join me for a 10-week journey, with weekly posts diving into each chapter, starting next week with Chapter 1’s bold vision. Let’s spark a global conversation about sovereignty and conflict!

Territorial disputes—from the Falkland/Malvinas Islands to San Andrés—are more pressing than ever, mirroring global crises like Russia-Ukraine. Yet, traditional analyses often rely on unidimensional lenses, prioritizing law or politics while ignoring emotions, nationalism, or indigenous voices. Territorial Disputes in the Americas challenges this, introducing a multidimensional framework that captures disputes’ full complexity. Chapter 1 critiques biases in legal and political sciences, unveiling the pluralism of pluralisms—a concept embracing diverse agents, contexts, and dimensions. This book unlocks the motivations behind leaders like Maduro’s defiance or Trump’s border rhetoric, and issues from Greenland’s strategic disputes to indigenous rights in the Amazon.

The book spans three parts and 10 chapters, applying the multidimensional approach to territorial disputes:

Part 1: Conceptual Foundations

 Chapter 1: Introduction – Defines sovereignty, territorial disputes, and pluralism of pluralisms, advocating a multidimensional approach.

Chapter 2: Sovereignty and Territorial Disputes– Explores sovereignty (factual, normative, axiological), dispute claims, and regional peacebuilding mechanisms.

Chapter 3: Pluralism of Pluralisms and the Multidimensional Approach– Details disputes’ multi-subjective, multi-contextual nature, with linear and nonlinear dimensions.

Part 2: Case Studies in the Americas

 Chapter 4: Common Roots to Territorial Disputes in the Americas– Traces disputes from pre-Columbian to post-independence eras, highlighting colonial legacies.

Chapter 5: Ongoing European Influence in the Americas– Analyzes cases like the Falkland/Malvinas, San Andrés, Hans Island, and Marouini River disputes.

Chapter 6: Neo-colonialism and Colonial Mindset – Examines influence from the US, Russia, China, and India in regional conflicts.

Chapter 7: Americans versus Americans– Covers intra-regional disputes (e.g., Guatemala-Belize, Venezuela-Guyana), including border and resource conflicts.

Chapter 8: Indigenous Rights and Implanted Populations – Explores indigenous claims versus settler colonialism, focusing on self-determination.

Part 3: Synthesis and Future Directions

Chapter 9: Territorial Claims over Antarctica– Applies the multidimensional approach to Antarctica’s claims, involving Latin America and global powers, and provides policy guidelines to protect humanity’s interests.

Chapter 10: Conclusive Remarks, Limitations, and Future Implications– Offers research and policy guidelines for broader applications.

This book redefines territorial disputes by integrating diverse agents (individuals, communities, states), contexts (domestic, regional, international), and factors (legal, political, emotional). It explains, for example why leaders like may fuel national pride or navigate diplomacy cautiously and may choose to perpetuate differences rather than solving them. From Greenland’s geopolitical tensions to indigenous struggles in the Amazon, it tackles multifaceted issues. Objectives include identifying common theoretical elements, evaluating peacebuilding practices (e.g., the 1998 Brasilia Peace Agreement), and proposing guidelines for future research and policy.

Building on my work (Núñez 2017, 2020, 2023), the book uses a modified realist model and case studies. The realist model examines domestic and international variables, while case studies test hypotheses against disputes like the Mexico–United States border or Antarctica’s claims. This dual approach ensures robust, empirically grounded insights.

Sovereignty is dynamic, encompassing factual (de facto), normative (de jure), and axiological (value-based) dimensions. Territorial disputes, narrowly state conflicts over land or water, are broadened to include indigenous and settler claims. For instance, the Falklands/Malvinas reflects Argentina’s identity and Britain’s prestige, while Greenland’s disputes (via Hans Island) involve strategic interests. This book redefines these concepts to decode leaders’ actions, from Trump’s border policies to Maduro’s territorial posturing.

Disputes are multi-subjective (individuals, communities, states), multi-contextual (local, regional, international), and multi-faceted (rational, empirical, axiological). The *pluralism of pluralisms* embraces diverse agents, roles, and dimensions (linear like time, nonlinear like chaotic interactions). For example, the San Andrés dispute involves legal claims, Raizal identity, and Colombia’s strategy. The multidimensional approach integrates these, rejecting unidimensional analyses to illuminate conflicts like those over the Amazon or Antarctica.

The book examines disputes involving sovereign states (e.g., Falklands/Malvinas, Venezuela-Guyana) and broader issues like indigenous rights and Antarctica’s claims. Cases like the Mexico–United States border highlight migratory tensions, while Greenland’s disputes reflect global interests. These examples showcase colonial legacies, neo-colonial influences, and peacebuilding strategies, such as regional guarantors in the Ecuador-Peru resolution.

Territorial Disputes in the Americas is your essential guide to the law, geopolitics, and human stories behind our continent’s conflicts. Whether you’re intrigued by Obama’s diplomacy, Milei’s rhetoric, indigenous rights, or disputes in Greenland, the Amazon, or Antarctica, this book delivers fresh insights. Starting next week, I’ll share weekly posts exploring each chapter, beginning with Chapter 1’s call to rethink sovereignty. Follow along, share your thoughts, and join the conversation! Pre-order details below!

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Monday 2nd March 2026

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

Tuesday, 24 February 2026

The Borders We Share: Section 7 Recap: Deserts and Plains (Posts 37–42)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 7: Deserts and Plains forms a pivotal chapter in The Borders We Share series, leading us on a vast, sun-scorched, wind-whipped journey through six posts that descend from the vertical frontiers of cities and rocks into the horizontal immensity of deserts and grasslands. From the wind-whispered, magnetically merged dunes of Laputa and the Sahara to the bleeding steppes of Cimmeria and Eurasia, from the unclaimed nowhere of Erewhon and Sinai to the crowned voids of Narnia and Sudan, and finally to the fading emerald plains of Oz and the Australian Outback, this section has explored the slow, patient violence of aridity and the quiet, stubborn resilience of those who live where green turns to dust and dust threatens to erase memory itself. Each post, from 37 to 42, has paired a mythic or fictional arid/grassland realm with a real-world counterpart, revealing how sovereignty in these open spaces is measured not in metres of altitude but in litres of water, hectares of grazing land, and the number of footsteps that can still cross a border before the sand or dust claims everything.

The journey has been marked by persistent, cautious hope: that even in places where life hangs by the thinnest thread of water or grass, dialogue and shared stewardship can turn scarcity into sufficiency. Through Dr. Jorge’s scholarly lens, Holmes’s relentless evidence-gathering, Watson’s meticulous notes, and Arthur’s quiet moral weight, we have witnessed councils where exiled cartographers, Sahrawi refugees, Kazakh herders, Bedouin elders, Dinka cattlemen, Arrernte song-keepers, Munchkin farmers, Warlpiri women, and many others have proposed frameworks for peace. These proposals—shared commissions, residency pathways, ecological corridors, veto rights, transparent naming of workers—have sought to transform deserts and plains from arenas of exclusion into shared horizons where no one is scenery and no one is ballast. This descent concludes Section 7 with the recognition that sand and grass remember every footprint, every promise kept or broken, and that the ground beneath us is always listening.

Post 37: Laputa’s Dunes, Sahara’s Split: Sand for All

The section opened with Laputa’s Waste (the crescent dunes formed by crystal extraction) and the Sahara (especially Western Sahara). Dune nomads and Sahrawi voices paralleled each other. The council proposed shared commissions, extraction caps, aquifer recharge, and residency pathways, restoring displaced families on both sides and addressing 18,000 tonnes of annual sand loss and 173,000 refugees in Tindouf camps.

Post 38: Cimmeria’s Flats, Steppes’ Stretch: Dust Meets Grass

Cimmeria’s brooding plains (stretched by Laputa’s magnetic pull) met the Eurasian steppe (Russia–Kazakhstan border). Conan, Bêlit’s daughter, Kazakh herders, and activists spoke. The accord established grassland commissions, soil regeneration funds, and shared ecological corridors to halt 14,000 hectares of annual erosion in Cimmeria and 1.8 million hectares of pasture loss on the steppe.

Post 39: Erewhon’s Sands, Sinai’s Edge: Nowhere to Share

Erewhon’s high plateau (Butler’s satirical nowhere-land) paralleled the Sinai Peninsula. Erewhon citizens and Bedouin elders voiced their claims. The Sand Accord created joint commissions, water caps, residency pathways, and shared courts to protect aquifers and grazing rights, addressing 11,000 hectares of annual sand loss in Erewhon and 10,800 hectares of grazing land lost in Sinai since 2000.

Post 40: Narnia’s Wastes, Sudan’s Split: Kings of Nothing

Narnia’s Great Desert (the southern reach beyond the Lantern Waste) met the Sudan–South Sudan border wastes. Talking Beasts and pastoralists (Dinka, Nuer) spoke. The Wastes Accord set up desert commissions, recharge programmes, residency pathways, and shared courts to protect grazing corridors and water flows, addressing 12,000 hectares of annual sand loss in Narnia and 11,800 hectares of grazing land lost since 2011.

Post 41: Oz’s Plains, Outback’s Reach: Emerald to Dust

Oz’s flat emerald country met the Australian Outback. Munchkins, Scarecrow, Tin Woodman, Arrernte elders, and Warlpiri women spoke. The Plains Accord created joint commissions, soil regeneration funds, residency pathways, and shared courts to halt 9,000 hectares of meadow loss in Oz and 8,900 hectares of grazing land loss in Australia since 2015.

Post 42: Laputa’s Dunes, Part II: Quantum Sands

The section closed by returning to Laputa’s Waste and the Sahara, now entangled by wind and magnetic drift. Nomads, Sahrawi refugees, Polisario commanders, and Moroccan voices spoke of shared memory and living boundaries. The Quantum Sands Accord deepened shared commissions, raised revenue shares for resettlement and schools, and reinforced cross-border courts and transparency rules to manage the breathing, moving frontier, addressing 18,000 tonnes of annual sand exchange and the fate of 2,900 nomad families and 173,000 Sahrawi refugees.

Across these six arid landscapes, recurring themes have emerged like wind-carved patterns in sand. The tension between distant claims and lived reality—Laputa’s scholars ignoring nomads, Morocco’s infrastructure versus Sahrawi exile, pastoral leases versus songlines—underscored the cost of treating inhabitants as scenery. Environmental fragility was constant: topsoil loss, aquifer depletion, dune migration, grass die-back. Historical and ongoing dispossession cast long shadows: colonial borders, forced displacements, resource extraction. Yet each post proposed shared-sovereignty models that balanced equal voices, traditional roles for elders and nomads, ecological rewards (recharge, regeneration, corridors), and support for the vulnerable through residency pathways, schools, and transparent naming of workers.

Regional mediators (UN, Omani elders, Latin American guarantor models) and global precedents provided scaffolds, tested by pilot zones, joint courts, and transparent ledgers. Challenges persisted: prestige payoffs for distant capitals, external resource interests (oil, mining, phosphates), and the moral weight of displacement—from 1,100 Munchkins to 173,000 Sahrawi refugees. These themes wove a narrative of cautious hope: that even in the arid heart, where life hangs by the thinnest thread of water or grass, shared stewardship can turn scarcity into sufficiency.

The cultural richness of desert and plain peoples has been a cornerstone. Sahrawi keys to houses never returned to, Laputan nomads’ oases that vanish with magnetic tides, Kazakh herders’ ancient valleys, Bedouin songlines across Sinai granite, Dinka cattle corridors, Arrernte starlit maps, Munchkin whispers in the grass—each tradition stands as testament to resilience yet faces erosion under exclusion and extraction. These voices were championed in councils that sought to preserve them, aligning with Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty’s emphasis on moral equality. Historical layers—Spanish withdrawal (1975), Mabo (1992), CPA (2005), independence referendum (2011)—illuminated how colonial and post-colonial lines continue to fracture lives, while reformers pushed for equity. Fictional counterparts (Laputa’s Waste, Narnia’s dunes) served as allegorical mirrors, allowing timeless exploration of sovereignty where real timelines are heavy with pain. This blend, grounded in data (e.g., 18,000 tonnes sand exchange, 1.8 million hectares pasture loss), enriched the section, offering a multidimensional view that Territorial Disputes in the Americas seeks to expand.

Achievements are tangible and symbolic. Collaborative efforts across posts restored thousands of displaced families, recharged aquifers, regenerated soil, reopened corridors, and funded schools and residency pathways. Shared commissions, veto rights, and transparency rules (worker naming, revenue shares) created measurable benchmarks. Pilot zones and joint courts proved dialogue’s power.

Challenges loomed large: skepticism from academies and capitals, external resource interests, historical mistrust, and environmental fragility (dune migration, grass die-back). These obstacles highlighted the core task: transforming wary echoes into trust, requiring sustained effort and international support, setting the stage for future exploration.

As Section 7: Deserts and Plains concludes, the journey shifts to flowing new horizons with Section 8: Rivers and Flows (Posts 43–48), resuming Tuesday 24 February 2026. This upcoming section will explore how water—life’s most intimate border—can divide or unite.

Post 43: Sherwood’s Stream, Nile’s Flow: Green to Blue – Robin’s river meets Egypt-Ethiopia Nile tensions.

Post 44: Laputa’s Falls, Mekong’s Rush: Sky to Stream – Laputa’s waters rush toward China-SE Asia Mekong disputes.

Post 45: Utopia’s Banks, Indus’ Bend: Perfect Waters – Utopian rivers parallel India-Pakistan Indus claims.

Post 46: Ruritania’s Tide, Danube’s Dance: Crowns of Current – Ruritanian tides meet Romania-Ukraine Danube.

Post 47: Narnia’s Run, Euphrates’ End: Royal Rivers – Narnian flows join Turkey-Iraq Euphrates.

Post 48: Cimmeria’s Flood, Amur’s Edge: Dust Washes East – Cimmerian rivers wash toward Russia-China Amur.

This transition from arid plains to living rivers promises to extend the series’ theme of transforming conflict into cooperation. Join me, Dr. Jorge, at https://drjorge.world or X as we follow the water’s path toward shared futures.

• Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

• Territorial Disputes (2020).

• Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023). 

• Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

New posts every Tuesday.

Post 42: Laputa’s Dunes, Part II: Quantum Sands

Bonus Post: A Tapestry of Shared Horizons – Summing Up The Borders We Share (Sections 1–7)

Section 8: Rivers and Flows (Posts 43–48)

43, Sherwood’s Stream, Nile’s Flow: Green to Blue

44, Laputa’s Falls, Mekong’s Rush: Sky to Stream

45, Utopia’s Banks, Indus’ Bend: Perfect Waters

46, Ruritania’s Tide, Danube’s Dance: Crowns of Current

47, Narnia’s Run, Euphrates’ End: Royal Rivers

48, Cimmeria’s Flood, Amur’s Edge: Dust Washes East

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 24th February 2026

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world