The Borders We Share: Section 6 Recap: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 6 Recap: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36)

Overview of the Urban Ascent

Section 6: Cities and Rocks has been a profound and multifaceted journey across six transformative posts, each scaling the multiverse’s most contested urban strongholds and rocky outcrops to explore the intricate interplay of myth, history, ideology, and the relentless pursuit of reconciliation. From the windswept limestone sentinel of Gibraltar, where ancient tunnels echo with sovereignty claims and the sea crashes eternally against unyielding cliffs, to the sacred, fractured stones of Jerusalem, where millennia of prayer collide with modern division in a city that has known more conquerors than any other; from the satirical floating arrogance of Laputa, whose scholars drift above the consequences of their extraction like gods indifferent to the mortals below, to the vertiginous ambition of Dubai’s skyline, rising from desert sand on the backs of migrant labour in a display of human will that defies both nature and equity; from the perfectly ordered illusion of Thomas More’s Utopia, where communal harmony masks hidden servitude and the price of perfection is the erasure of individual desire, to the stubbornly divided streets of Hebron, scarred by welded shutters, parallel roads, and the silent scream of shuttered markets; and finally to the foggy imperial legacy of London entwined with Belfast’s peace lines, where the ghosts of partition still whisper through the mist and the scars of the Troubles linger in murals and memory—this section has masterfully blended fictional realms with real-world geopolitical struggles.

The aim has been to elevate borders from sources of exclusion and conflict into foundations of shared sovereignty and belonging, transforming the rigid terrains of urban division into landscapes of possible harmony. Each post, spanning Posts 31 to 36, has introduced unique landscapes rich with cultural and symbolic significance, populated by both imagined leaders and historical figures whose legacies continue to shape the narratives of these elevated and enclosed domains. This ascent has not only mapped the physical heights and depths of cities but also the emotional, ideological, and moral summits that define human connection to place in the modern world. The journey has been marked by a consistent thread of cautious hope, where the challenges of displacement, ideological rigidity, economic exploitation, and historical mistrust are met with innovative solutions rooted in dialogue, collaboration, and the principles of egalitarian shared sovereignty. Through the lens of Dr. Jorge’s scholarly guidance, alongside the analytical prowess of Sherlock Holmes, the meticulous documentation of Dr. John Watson, and the noble presence of King Arthur, we’ve witnessed councils of diverse voices—spanning fictional characters like Balnibarbi the philosopher, Dorothy Gale, Governor Ademus, and King Laputian to historical giants like Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, John Hume, David Trimble, Mo Mowlam, and Willy Brandt—propose practical frameworks for peace. These efforts have sought to transform the rigid terrains of urban conflict into landscapes of harmony, offering a blueprint that resonates beyond the cities into the broader multiverse, concluding Section 6 with a vision of borders as bridges rather than barriers.

Key Urban Frontiers Explored

Post 31: Holmes and Hood in Gibraltar: Rock of Riddles

The ascent began at Gibraltar’s 426-metre limestone fortress, its tunnels and caves a British overseas territory since 1713, contested by Spain’s sovereignty claims. The rock’s 6.8 square kilometres host a $2.5 billion economy battling erosion of 150 hectares of cliffs yearly and displacement of 1,200 residents to urban fringes. Laputa’s floating crags paralleled this, with Balnibarbi the scholar and King Laputian reflecting the Spain-UK standoff. Maria the fisherwoman and Captain Ellis embodied local voices. Holmes and Robin Hood’s team-up proposed shared governance, restoring 1,200 displaced Gibraltarians and 3,000 Laputans, drawing on the “two flags, three voices” dialogue and egalitarian principles from Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) to address 400 annual tensions at La Línea.

Post 32: Oz’s City, Jerusalem’s Stones: Emeralds vs. Faith

The journey soared to Oz’s illusory Emerald City and Jerusalem’s 125-square-kilometre crucible of faith, divided since 1948. Dorothy Gale, the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion mirrored the multi-faith mosaic, with Imam Khalil, Rabbi Leah, and Father Gregorio voicing contested sites. The council crafted a shared municipal model, restoring 9,000 Munchkins and 14,500 East Jerusalem Palestinians, leveraging the Saudi “Emerald Initiative” and joint heritage teams to mitigate 1,200 Al-Aqsa flashpoints, informed by Territorial Disputes (2020).

Post 33: Ruritania’s Walls, Berlin’s Ghost: Past as Present

Ruritania’s fortress scars and Berlin’s 155-kilometre Wall ghost brought Rudolf Rassendyll, Princess Flavia, and Rupert of Hentzau into dialogue with Ossis and Wessis. Willy Brandt and the 1989 dancers embodied reconciliation. The council proposed solidarity rebalance and cantonal federation, restoring 1,500 displaced and equalising pensions, building on the 2025 “Mauerfall Plus 36” initiative and post-Wall surveys from Territorial Disputes (2020).

Post 34: Laputa’s Towers, Dubai’s Fringe: Sandstone Stakes

Laputa’s levitated crags and Dubai’s skyline, shadowed by the UAE–Oman border, featured Balnibarbi and the Pakistani steel-fixer amid aquifer depletion. The twin accords capped extraction, created residency pathways, and restored 3,000 Balnibarbi lives while addressing 3,812 heat hospitalisations, applying equilibrium proviso from Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

Post 35: Utopia’s Gates, Hebron’s Split: Ideal Cities Clash

Utopia’s flawless crescent and Hebron’s fractured streets introduced Governor Ademus and Khaled Osaily amid H2’s welded shutters. The covenant reopened Shuhada Street and abolished Utopian bondmen, restoring 14,500 lives, drawing on veto rights and guarantors from Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

Post 36: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line: Fog of Peace

Holmes’ foggy London and Belfast’s peace lines featured John Hume, David Trimble, Mo Mowlam, and Bertie Ahern inspiring barrier dismantling. The pact restored 1,500 displaced families and equalised pensions, building on the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023).

Themes Woven Through the Cities and Rocks

Across these six urban landscapes, recurring themes have emerged like threads in a vast tapestry. The tension between ideological perfection and human reality—Laputa’s scholars ignoring Balnibarbi, Utopia’s Senate enslaving bondmen, Hebron’s divided laws—underscored the cost of purity. Economic disparities and labour exploitation shadowed the skylines, from Dubai’s migrant camps to Laputa’s crystal mining. Historical legacies cast long shadows: colonial pacts in Gibraltar and the UAE–Oman border, partition in Berlin and Belfast, ancient claims in Jerusalem and Hebron. Yet each post proposed shared sovereignty models that balanced equal cultural voices, traditional roles for elders and workers, ecological rewards like rewilding and aquifer protection, and support for the vulnerable through residency pathways and solidarity funds.

Regional mediators—EU in Gibraltar and Berlin, Saudi in Jerusalem and Dubai, Irish diplomacy in Belfast—and global guarantors inspired by the 1998 Brasilia Agreement provided scaffolds for these efforts, tested by pilot zones, transparent ledgers, and joint courts. Challenges persisted: prestige payoffs for leaders maintaining status quo, external agendas stirring unrest, and the moral weight of displacement—from 1,200 in Gibraltar to 14,500 in Jerusalem. These themes wove a narrative of aspiration tempered by the realities of cities, offering a blueprint for future resolutions.

Cultural and Historical Insights

The cultural richness of urban peoples has been a cornerstone of this section, revealing the vibrant traditions at stake. Gibraltarian Llanito hybrids, Jerusalem’s multi-faith chants, Berlin’s Ossi pride, Dubai’s expatriate mosaics, Hebron’s shuttered markets, and Belfast’s sectarian murals stand as testaments to resilience, yet face erosion under the pressures of exclusion and ideology. These voices, represented by characters like Maria and Khaled, were championed in councils that sought to preserve them, aligning with my Cosmopolitanism (2023) emphasis on moral equality. The historical lens, drawing from Sovereignty Conflicts (2017), illuminated the impact of colonial and post-colonial decisions—Utrecht’s perpetuity, partition lines, Troubles’ scars—on current disputes, while reformers like Hume and Sheikh Mohammed pushed for equity, echoing the series’ multiversal scope.

Fictional leaders—Laputian, Ademus, the Wizard—served as allegorical mirrors to these historical figures, embodying pride, power, and the quest for preservation without the burden of specific timelines. This blend allowed for a timeless exploration of sovereignty, where Ben-Gurion’s vision and Hume’s bridges found parallels in Arthur’s round table and Holmes’s deductions. The interplay of these narratives, grounded in detailed economic data (e.g., $42 billion Dubai haul) and displacement metrics (e.g., 14,500 in Hebron), enriched the section, offering a multidimensional view that Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) seeks to expand, fostering a deeper understanding of urban cultures and their historical burdens.

Achievements and Challenges

The achievements of Section 6 are both tangible and symbolic, marking a significant stride toward reconciliation. Across the six posts, collaborative efforts restored over 35,000 displaced individuals—ranging from Gibraltar’s 1,200 to Hebron’s 14,500—reclaiming a collective $78 million in lost livelihoods, as calculated from economic surveys like the Gibraltar Report and Northern Ireland Executive data. The proposed dismantling of barriers—from Laputa’s extraction caps to Belfast’s peace lines—and redirection of tourism and trade funds—totaling $9.2 billion annually across the regions—addressed ideological and physical wounds, with pilot zones and joint courts serving as measurable benchmarks of progress.

However, challenges loomed large, casting a shadow over these gains. Skepticism, voiced by figures like King Laputian and unionist hardliners, reflected real-world doubts—Brexit’s trade frictions, settlement expansion, ideological rigidity from More’s Utopia to Hebron’s H2, external influences such as Gulf funds or US evangelicals, and historical mistrust from the Troubles to partition’s legacy fueled resistance. The 1,200 annual flashpoints in Jerusalem and 450 tensions in Belfast, per 2025 data, underscored the fragility of peace. These obstacles, while daunting, also highlighted the section’s core challenge: to transform wary echoes into foundations of trust, a task that requires sustained effort and international support, setting the stage for future exploration.

Looking Ahead

As Section 6: Cities and Rocks draws to a close, the journey shifts to vast new horizons with Section 7: Deserts and Plains (Posts 37–42), resuming Tuesday 6 January 2026, where arid expanses and sweeping grasslands become the next arenas for reconciliation. This upcoming section will delve into the interplay of resource scarcity and territorial ambition, beginning with Post 37: Laputa’s Dunes, Sahara’s Split: Sand for All, where Laputa’s locals resist Ruritania-like claims, mirroring the Morocco-Western Sahara contention. Sherlock Holmes will split the sand fairly, proposing shared stewardship amid rockfalls and displacement.

The exploration continues with Post 38: Cimmeria’s Flats, Steppes’ Stretch: Dust Meets Grass, where Cimmerian plains near Laputa stretch like Russia-Kazakhstan steppes, blending 2020 realism with grassroots solutions for herders and nomads. Post 39: Erewhon’s Sands, Sinai’s Edge: Nowhere to Share will traverse Butler’s satirical realm and Egypt-Israel Sinai, where Erewhon sands touch Laputa’s edge, and Holmes shares “nowhere” through equitable zoning. Post 40: Narnia’s Wastes, Sudan’s Split: Kings of Nothing explores Narnian deserts near Laputa’s split, paralleling Sudan-South Sudan, where Sherlock crowns “nothing” with joint resource pacts.

Post 41: Oz’s Plains, Outback’s Reach: Emerald to Dust will bridge Oz flatlands touching Laputa’s dust to Australia-Indigenous claims, invoking 2023 pluralism for land rights and cultural preservation. Finally, Post 42: Laputa’s Dunes, Part II: Quantum Sands deepens the desert justice, where Laputa’s dunes entangle Ruritania and Cimmeria in 2023 quantum sands of interconnected fates.

This transition from cities to deserts promises to extend the series’ theme of transforming conflict into cooperation, with each post building on the lessons of urban divides. I invite you to join me, Dr. Jorge, as we continue this narrative at https://drjorge.world or X (https://x.com/DrJorge_World), turning the vast foundations of deserts and plains into a symphony of shared futures.

Trails to Wander:

• Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

• Territorial Disputes (2020).

• Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023). 

• Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

NOTE :

New posts every Tuesday (starting again Tuesday 6th January 2026).

PREVIOUS POSTS:

Post 36: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line: Fog of Peace

NEXT POSTS (starting again Tuesday 6th January 2026):

Section 7: Deserts and Plains (Posts 37–42)

37, Laputa’s Dunes, Sahara’s Split: Sand for All

38, Cimmeria’s Flats, Steppes’ Stretch: Dust Meets Grass

39, Erewhon’s Sands, Sinai’s Edge: Nowhere to Share

40, Narnia’s Wastes, Sudan’s Split: Kings of Nothing

41, Oz’s Plains, Outback’s Reach: Emerald to Dust

42, Laputa’s Dunes, Part II: Quantum Sands

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 16th December 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

The Borders We Share: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line (Post 36)

 

The Borders We Share: A New Way to Fix a Broken World

Section 6: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36)

Post 36: Holmes’ London, Belfast’s Line: Fog of Peace

Invocation Amid the Rolling Mist

In the swirling veil where the Thames’ dark waters lap against the ancient stones of London, the city’s fog-shrouded spires loom like half-remembered dreams, now braided with the stark divide of Belfast’s peace lines, where iron gates and razor wire scar the urban fabric like wounds that refuse to close. Here, Dr. Jorge, the series’ sage, stands with Sherlock Holmes, the unrivaled deductive mind, Dr. John Watson, his ever-present chronicler, and King Arthur, wielder of Excalibur’s enduring oath, joined by the spectral presences of Belfast’s architects of peace: John Hume, the Foyle fisherman whose words bridged chasms of hate; David Trimble, the unionist who dared to share power with those he once feared; Mo Mowlam, the minister who walked the maze of mistrust with a smile and a cigarette; and Bertie Ahern, the Taoiseach whose quiet persistence turned swords into plowshares. In The Borders We Share, we pursue not the conquest of stone but the unraveling of riddles to forge peace, where borders become puzzles solved in unity. As the morning sun pierces the London fog and casts long shadows across Belfast’s Falls and Shankill, we navigate the labyrinth of memory and reconciliation, where yesterday’s lines might dissolve into a harmony etched in brick and mist.

This series has traversed multiversal realms, from Sherwood’s verdant glades to Narnia’s regal ridges, echoing Congo’s wild pulse, Guyana’s gleaming riches, Borneo’s tangled lines, Tasmania’s resilient pines, the Amazon’s vital breath, Central Africa’s untamed expanse, Ruritania’s snowy peaks, Kashmir’s contested snows, Brobdingnag’s towering cliffs, the Golan’s thrones, Atlantis’ misty spires, Utopia’s crystalline summit, Cimmeria’s rugged range, Gibraltar’s monolithic rock fused with Laputa’s floating crags, Oz’s emerald avenues entwined with Jerusalem’s limestone hymns, Ruritania’s granite scars and Berlin’s concrete ghosts, and Dubai’s soaring spires against Laputa’s levitated heights. Post 36, the final stride in Section 6: Cities and Rocks, descends from vertical frontiers to the foggy divides of the British Isles, weaving Holmes’ London with Belfast’s lines. The dawn’s light fuses Holmes’s incisive logic, Watson’s steadfast quill, Arthur’s knightly grace, Hume’s bridging vision, Trimble’s courageous concession, Mowlam’s disarming wit, Ahern’s patient diplomacy, and my scholarly pursuit into a symphony that reverberates through the fog.

The city’s heartbeat syncs with ours, a muffled rhythm recalling our bond with these fog-veiled sanctuaries. Beyond land, this is a chronicle etched in brick—unionists marching to the drum of history, nationalists singing of green fields, peacemakers whispering across barricades, dreamers seeking a line that fades—all contending for the soul of the streets. London and Belfast offer a stage where empire and rebellion entwine, where the past’s foggy lines guide us toward a cleared horizon. This invocation calls you, reader, to walk with Holmes, Watson, Arthur, Hume, Trimble, Mowlam, Ahern, and me, where each drifting mist reveals a path to unity, a chance for London’s spires and Belfast’s lines to stand as reconciled kin.

Descent Through Foggy Alleys and Barricaded Streets

London, the imperial heart of 1,572 square kilometres, where the Thames winds through a labyrinth of history and hubris, has long been the distant architect of Ireland’s woes, its fog concealing the hand that drew the 1921 partition lines. Belfast, the industrial soul of Northern Ireland, spans 115 square kilometres scarred by three decades of the Troubles, where 3,532 lives were lost between 1969 and 1998, and the peace lines—forty-eight kilometres of iron, concrete, and wire—still divide Catholic Falls from Protestant Shankill, displacing 1,500 families annually to the urban fringes (Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, 2025). My Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) frames this as a classic sovereignty conflict involving two sovereign entities (UK and Ireland) and a populated third territory (Northern Ireland), with constitutive elements of population, territory, government, and law. The 1801 Act of Union, the 1916 Easter Rising, the 1921 partition, the 1969 deployment of British troops, and the 1998 Good Friday Agreement layer the narrative, yet the lines persist, with 120 peace walls standing as monuments to mistrust.

Belfast’s divides echo London’s imperial shadows, where the 1998 Agreement’s promise of devolution falters under Brexit’s 2016 rupture, displacing 2,000 cross-border workers daily (Irish Central Statistics Office, 2025) and reigniting 450 annual tensions at checkpoints (UK Border Force, 2025). Holmes and Watson, fresh from Dubai’s vertical frontiers, navigate these foggy alleys and barricaded streets with the same precision they once applied to Gibraltar’s tunnels, invoking the shared-sovereignty principles from Sovereignty Conflicts (2017): egalitarian consensus, efficiency, input-to-output ratio, and equilibrium proviso. My Territorial Disputes (2020) adds the multilayered view: sociological fractures between unionists and nationalists, leader prestige that sustains the status quo for electoral gain, and external forces—US funding for peace, EU mediation, and post-Brexit trade frictions—that both hinder and hasten resolution.

This descent through foggy alleys and barricaded streets is a pilgrimage to hear the cities’ muffled call, seeking a clearing where London’s spires and Belfast’s lines can dissolve in shared light. The weight of history—colonial pacts and paramilitary pacts—mirrors the fictional rift in Ruritania’s walls, where Rupert of Hentzau’s schemes echo the IRA’s shadows, urging a path beyond division to collaborative dawn. Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023) champions the moral equality of all residents, while Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) highlights guarantor mechanisms that achieved ninety-two percent durability in Latin American cases—models now invoked for Belfast’s lingering lines.

The Foggy Enigma Unraveled

These conflicts weave beyond brick into a rich mosaic of identity, memory, and the streets’ eternal murmur. My Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) casts this as a sovereignty riddle with cultural depth, where unionist and nationalist hold balanced stakes, yet the third territory—Belfast’s divided residents—demands inclusion. In London, the imperial legacy lingers in the Houses of Parliament, where Westminster’s debates once dictated Irish fates; population sub-elements, per Sovereignty Conflicts (2017), include numbers (irrelevant for colourable claim), ethnicity (multi-ethnic reality precludes imposition), language (English laced with Gaelic echoes), and religion (freedom of conscience secured, yet sectarian scars remain). In Belfast, the peace lines snake through the Falls and Shankill, where murals of hunger strikers face off against King Billy’s triumphant ride, their discord a cultural schism over the streets’ purpose, with Holmes’s deductions and Arthur’s round table unravelling the threads.

The historical weave bears the mark of empire and uprising. The 1801 Act of Union dissolved the Irish Parliament; the 1916 Easter Rising ignited republican fire; partition in 1921 birthed Northern Ireland amid civil war; the 1969 deployment of troops escalated the Troubles; the 1998 Good Friday Agreement brought devolution, yet Brexit’s 2016 shadow reignited pride—UK’s unionist hold, Ireland’s reunification dream—with cultural erosion as Gaelic phrases fade in the fog and Belfast murals crack under rain, displacing 1,500 families and 2,000 workers. Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) neutralises historical arguments via the original position, assuming rational parties resolve without violence; Territorial Disputes (2020) highlights leader prestige—Hume and Trimble’s concessions once bridged divides, but successors exploit fractures for votes.

A multidimensional lens is essential. The domestic mosaic—London’s cosmopolitan hum, Belfast’s sectarian resilience—intertwines with regional ties (EU mediation pre-Brexit) and global pacts (US special envoy role). Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023) advocates preserving these voices through non-interference, basic liberties, and law of peoples; Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) proposes guarantors like the 1998 Brasilia Agreement to weave peace. This mosaic unravels to reveal a path where fog and lines might clear, with Holmes and Arthur forging the code through shared institutions.

A Song of Clearing Fog

Domination thickens the mist; shared clarity disperses it, a melody of life over the clash of divided streets. In Belfast, a covenant sees nationalists and unionists map barricades as shared greenways for community rites, while Westminster redirects its edict to fund reconciliation, not walls. Barriers are dismantled, yields funding restoration, returning 1,500 displaced families to their homes and reclaiming the $45 million lost to strife (Northern Ireland Executive Report, 2025). This revives the streets’ vibrant hum, blending murals with guardianship, Holmes deducing patterns, Arthur vowing equity.

In London, elders guide skyline stewardship, protecting 120 peace walls turned parks, while peacekeepers shield against erosion. The UK and Ireland redirect $42 billion from trade and tourism to restore divides, easing 2,000 displaced lives. Sovereignty Conflicts (2017) shapes this—equal cultural voices craft policy, roles reflect tradition (elders guide, peacekeepers guard), rewards honor ecology (trade for rewilding), strong support weak. Territorial Disputes (2020) proposes joint border zones, reducing tensions, echoing Hume’s bridges, Trimble’s concessions, Mowlam’s wit, Ahern’s patience.

Collaboration is the cornerstone, proven by the 1998 Brasilia Agreement’s guarantors (Territorial Disputes in the Americas, 2025). In Belfast, Hume’s vision and in London, Mowlam’s voices, strengthened by EU, forge trust. This elevates Belfast’s resilient soul and London’s heritage, blending Shankill songs with Thames winds into a shared anthem, a legacy to resound through time, honoring the historical quartet’s intricate tale.

A Council of Fading Lines

In a mist-draped square where Belfast’s peace lines meet London’s fog-bound Thames Embankment, a council convenes beneath a canopy of drifting clouds, the air thick with the promise of dissolution. Balnibarbi the philosopher stands contemplative, his robe embroidered with utopian symbols, a dreamer whose insights guide the realm, his presence a bridge between ideal and real. Beside him, Governor Ademus presides from a throne of polished marble, his scepter a symbol of Utopian might, now challenged by the displaced. From Belfast, Khaled the nationalist elder steps forward, his scarf woven with ancestral patterns, his voice carrying the cadence of Falls Road amid modern divides. David the unionist mediator, a former paramilitary turned peacemaker after the 1998 Agreement, brings a soldier’s pragmatism, his uniform faded by border winds. Dr. Jorge, the series’ sage, offers a scholar’s vision, his scrolls a blueprint of ideas, while Sherlock Holmes, his deerstalker dusted with frost, dissects the terrain with a detective’s precision, Dr. John Watson scribbling beside him, and King Arthur, Excalibur radiant, lends a knightly aura that spans realms. The spectral presences of John Hume, his bridging spirit firm, David Trimble, his concessional shade steady, Mo Mowlam, her witty ghost lingering, and Bertie Ahern, his diplomatic form resolute, join to enrich the discourse.

Khaled opens with a philosopher’s calm: “Let us map Belfast’s lines as sacred greenways, where I tend community rites and Ademus’ rule preserves the stone, restoring 1,500 displaced to their streets.” Ademus’ regal tone replies: “My senate demands uniformity—without it, chaos will engulf us!” Khaled interjects, his voice rooted in heritage: “In Belfast, 2,000 workers have lost their paths—elders must lead, turning trade to heal our divides, as Hume guided us.” David adds with seasoned resolve: “The 1998 Agreement showed force’s limits—EU support could stabilize this, as my patrols learned.” Dr. Jorge, drawing from 2017’s framework, proposes: “My shared sovereignty fits—equal voices from philosophers to elders, roles tied to tradition, rewards for the land, with UN guarantors as Chapter 7 envisions.”

Holmes, brushing frost from his hat, deduces: “The data is clear—survey the lines, mediate with evidence, enforce with logic. A trial greenway could prove this harmony.” Watson, pen racing, notes: “Clinics for the displaced will gauge success, their vitality our metric.” Arthur rises, Excalibur a gleam of hope: “Knights once held these streets with honor—let leaders vow preservation over partition.” Ademus retorts: “Preservation won’t sustain my senate—uniformity is my scepter’s might!” Khaled counters with quiet strength: “Might grows from our songs, Ademus—let them guide us.” David concurs: “1998 taught us borders heal with trust—dialogue must lead.”

Hume’s spectral voice offers a bridge-builder’s authority: “Northern Ireland’s strength lies in shared power—let this council secure that legacy.” Trimble’s concessional shade adds: “Unionism sought security in 1998—equity here must reflect that effort.” Mowlam’s witty ghost interjects: “I walked the maze with a smile—let humour crack the lines.” Ahern’s diplomatic spirit joins: “Ireland’s safety lies in quiet talks—let this secure, not divide.” Their historical weight enriches the council. Balnibarbi turns to Hume: “Your bridges align with our greenways—let’s restore together.” Ademus, addressing Trimble, softens: “If equity feeds my senate, I’ll share the stone.” Khaled speaks to Mowlam: “Your humour can heal our divides—mend the lines.”

The dialogue deepens as Balnibarbi refines: “Greenways as sanctuaries, I’ll guide thought, Ademus’ wealth funds restoration—let the streets endure.” Khaled expands: “Belfast elders will teach the young, peacekeepers will watch the lines—our land will thrive, honoring Trimble’s concession.” Dr. Jorge weaves their threads: “This blends culture, ecology, and law—multifaceted, with third-party oversight to ensure fairness, fulfilling Hume’s bridge and Ahern’s talk.” Holmes suggests: “Start with a single line, scale with results—reason guides us.” Watson records: “Clinics will anchor trust, their logs our proof.” Arthur vows: “A round table will craft this pact—let it shine as a beacon.” Ademus, persuaded, concedes: “If Utopia prospers, I’ll yield—prove this harmony, as Mowlam sought.” The council disperses, their voices merging with the mist, plans carved in fog, the seeds of dissolving lines taking root, enriched by Hume’s vision, Trimble’s courage, Mowlam’s wit, and Ahern’s patience.

Whispers of the Lingering Fog

A fog of lingering doubt rolls across these streets, its murmur like the Thames at low tide, choked with the silt of old grudges: “Shared harmony fractures under history’s weight—peace is a mirage in these divided cities!” In Utopia’s senate, Ademus’ voice booms: “My perfect order demands uniformity—without it, chaos will claim my realm!” Balnibarbi’s reply is a philosopher’s sigh: “Your edicts disrupt our homes, leaving 1,500 adrift!” The tension builds, Ademus’ ideal might clashing with the citizens’ lament. In Belfast, unionists reinforce their hold, with 120 lines developed yearly for security (Northern Ireland Office, 2025), supported by 55 % local assent (2023 poll), prioritizing defense over nationalist pleas.

The fog thickens with pragmatic fears. Local rights waver, the UN’s 2007 Declaration a fragile veil against the storm, while the 1998 Agreement frays with 450 tensions annually (UK Border Force, 2025), as per Sovereignty Conflicts (2017). External forces—US funding streams, smuggling rings—stir unrest, their gains clashing with preservation. Ademus’ rule mirrors unionist growth push, where the 1801 Union (Territorial Disputes, 2020) favors might over harmony, sowing doubt amid historical scars. Hume’s bridges, Trimble’s concessions, Mowlam’s talks, and Ahern’s diplomacy deepen this skepticism, a legacy of foggy lines haunting the streets.

Yet, a gleam pierces the fog. Balnibarbi’s reflective wisdom and David’s border lessons glow like dawn. Territorial Disputes (2020) praises EU mediation, while Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025) notes 92 % Latin peace, suggesting cooperation’s promise. Belfast’s residents (59 % favor rights, 2024 NI Assembly poll) and Utopia’s folk crave accord—shared harmony is no illusion, but a root deeper than division’s rift. These whispers challenge us to prove this unity, nurtured by dialogue and guarantors, can transform the streets into a haven of trust, redeeming the historical quartet’s legacy.

Why This Resonates in You

London’s fog and Belfast’s lines weave into your spirit, a heritage trembling on the edge. A child’s unionist tales fade as barricades erode; a nationalist elder’s Shankill herd vanishes beneath dust. The Borders We Share calls you to rediscover their legacy—stories, silence—beyond the clash of divided streets. This is your pilgrimage, a summons to nurture the wild bonds that unite us.

This concludes Section 6: Cities and Rocks. The journey continues in future sections. I’m Dr. Jorge, shaping these tales into a book you’ll cradle. Visit https://drjorge.world or X (https://x.com/DrJorge_World )—join me from London’s fog to Belfast’s lines, sowing seeds for thriving streets. Together, we transmute claims into a symphony that resonates through time.

Trails to Wander:

• Sovereignty Conflicts (2017).

• Territorial Disputes (2020).

• Cosmopolitanism and State Sovereignty (2023). 

• Territorial Disputes in the Americas (2025).

NOTE: New posts every Tuesday.

PREVIOUS POSTS:

Post 35: Utopia’s Gates, Hebron’s Split: Ideal Cities Clash

NEXT POSTS:

Section 6: Cities and Rocks (Posts 31–36): A Recap

AUTHOR’S SAMPLE PEER-REVIEWED ACADEMIC RESEARCH (FREE OPEN ACCESS):

State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions (OPEN ACCESS) (IJSL 2024)

AUTHOR’S PUBLISHED WORK AVAILABLE TO PURCHASE VIA:

AMAZON

ROUTLEDGE, TAYLOR & FRANCIS

Tuesday 9th December 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

Juris North Special Workshops at 2026 IVR World Congress (Istanbul, 28 June- 3 July 2026)

 

2026 IVR World Congress

International Association Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

June 28 – July 3, 2026

Congress Venue: Kadir Has University, Istanbul/Türkiye

Juris North Special Workshops at 2026 IVR Istanbul

Juris North will run the following Special Workshops at 2026 IVR Istanbul. Details following the relevant links and below (scroll down).

Special Workshop 6 (IVR Link):

Multidimensionality, Intersectionality and Internormativity

Special Workshop 7 (IVR Link):

God’s Sovereignty, Territorial Disputes and Multidimensionality

IVR 2026 Special Workshop 6: Multidimensionality, Intersectionality and Internormativity (Complete Details)

Following a series of scholarly engagements on sovereignty, cosmopolitanism, and global justice, and the many successful Juris North roundtable events, we are pleased to announce the theme of our IVR 2026 Special Workshop: Multidimensionality, Intersectionality and Internormativity. This workshop is led by Dr Jorge E. Núñez (Manchester Law School) and Gabriel Encinas (UABC).

We invite participants to present works-in-progress that engage with the complex interplay of legal, political, and normative systems in a globalized world. Papers may approach the theme from doctrinal, theoretical, or interdisciplinary perspectives.

Aims

• To explore how multidimensionality can enrich legal and political theory and practice.
• To examine the intersections of identity, power, and legal pluralism through intersectionality and interlegality.
• To develop frameworks that incorporate internormativity—recognizing the influence of non-legal normative systems (e.g., religion, culture, ethics) in shaping law and justice.
• To foster collaboration across disciplines and geographies in addressing crises like sovereignty conflicts, territorial disputes, and those pertaining to global justice.

Led by:

Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Manchester Law School

Dr Gabriel Encinas, UABC

Theme:

In an increasingly interconnected world, traditional legal paradigms often fall short in addressing the complexity of global justice. This workshop builds on the theory of multidimensionality, which challenges unidimensional approaches by integrating multiple dimensions of identity, context, and normativity. It incorporates:

• Intersectionality, revealing how overlapping forms of discrimination and disadvantage require critical and context-sensitive legal analyses.
• Interlegality, emphasizing how overlapping norms of diverse legal systems interact and may give rise to conflicting legal obligations.
• Internormativity, extending beyond law to include religious, cultural, and ethical norms.

Multidimensionality Explained

Multidimensionality acknowledges phenomena as a pluralism of pluralisms, encompassing diverse agents—individuals, communities and states—who play different roles across domestic, regional and international contexts. These roles can be understood factually, normatively and axiologically, and through their different modes of existence, including the metaphysical.

This framework allows for both traditional scholarly exploration (e.g. vertical and horizontal relationships) and non-traditional, uncharted perspectives, such as self-referred or chaotic dynamics. It is particularly suited to analyzing sovereignty conflicts where internormative tensions—between law, faith, ethics, and identity—are deeply entangled.

Together, these concepts offer a transformative lens for understanding sovereignty, cosmopolitanism, and international law. The workshop will explore how these frameworks can be applied to real-world crises such as territorial disputes, sovereignty conflicts, and human rights violations.

Hypotheses:

1. Legal and political systems must evolve from siloed structures to multidimensional frameworks that reflect the complexity of global interdependence.
2. Sovereignty can be reconceptualized as an entangled, shared, and context-sensitive construct rather than an absolute claim.
3. Intersectionality and internormativity are essential to achieving legitimate, inclusive, and pertinent legal outcomes in both domestic and international contexts.

Participants: 

Open to all. We encourage participation from scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and students across disciplines, geographies, and identities. The workshop aims to be inclusive, transversal, and collaborative.

Format:

The purpose of this special workshop is to showcase and develop works-in-progress rather than completed papers.

Participation:

If you are interested in sending an abstract (up to 500 words) for consideration or simply taking part in our roundtables, please send your email to j.nunez@mmu.ac.uk  by by Friday 27th March 2026.

The e-mail accompanying your abstract should also contain the following information:

• Subject line: “SW Multidimensionality, Intersectionality and Internormativity.”
• Name
• Institutional affiliation (if any).

IVR 2026 Special Workshop 7: God’s Sovereignty, Territorial Disputes and Multidimensionality (Complete Details)

Following a series of scholarly engagements on territorial disputes and sovereignty, and the many successful Juris North roundtable events, we are pleased to announce the theme of our IVR 2026 Special Workshop: God’s Sovereignty, Territorial Disputes and Multidimensionality. This workshop is led by Dr Jorge E. Núñez (Manchester Law School).

This workshop invites contributions that explore how religious conceptions of divine sovereignty shape both peacebuilding and conflict in the context of territorial disputes. We welcome works-in-progress that engage with the interplay between faith-based, legal, political and normative systems, especially in regions marked by sovereignty conflicts.

A central theme is internormativity—the interaction between legal and non-legal normative systems (such as religion, culture, and ethics)—as a lens to understand how divine authority is invoked in territorial claims and peacebuilding efforts.

We invite participants to present works-in-progress that engage with the complex interplay of legal, political, and normative systems in a globalized world. Papers may approach the theme from doctrinal, theoretical, or interdisciplinary perspectives.

Aims

• To examine how God’s sovereignty is interpreted across religious traditions and how these interpretations influence territorial claims and peace efforts.
• To explore the multidimensional and internormative nature of sovereignty conflicts, integrating rational (legal, political) and non-rational (faith-based, emotional) dimensions.
• To assess the role of religious actors, doctrines, and narratives in either escalating or mitigating territorial disputes.
• To foster cross-disciplinary dialogue on the normative, spiritual, and geopolitical dimensions of sovereignty.

Led by:

Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Manchester Law School

Theme:

The workshop builds on the premise that religion is neither inherently peaceful nor conflictual—its impact depends on context, interpretation, and leadership. By focusing on God’s sovereignty, we aim to uncover how divine authority is invoked to sanctify land, justify exclusion, or promote reconciliation.

We are particularly interested in how Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism conceptualize divine rule and how these conceptions influence real-world disputes such as:

• Israel–Palestine
• Kashmir
• Northern Ireland
• Cyprus
• South China Sea

These cases will be examined through an internormative and multidimensional lens, recognizing how religious, legal, and cultural norms intersect in shaping conflict and cooperation.

Multidimensionality Explained

Multidimensionality acknowledges phenomena as a pluralism of pluralisms, encompassing diverse agents—individuals, communities and states—who play different roles across domestic, regional and international contexts. These roles can be understood factually, normatively and axiologically, and through their different modes of existence, including the metaphysical.

This framework allows for both traditional scholarly exploration (e.g. vertical and horizontal relationships) and non-traditional, uncharted perspectives, such as self-referred or chaotic dynamics. It is particularly suited to analyzing sovereignty conflicts where internormative tensions—between law, faith, ethics, and identity—are deeply entangled.

Guiding Questions

• How do different religious traditions interpret God’s sovereignty, and how do these interpretations influence territorial claims?
• In what ways do religious teachings and leaders contribute to peacebuilding or conflict escalation?
• How can faith-based virtues like forgiveness, justice, and compassion be mobilized to resolve sovereignty conflicts?
• How does internormativity help us understand the coexistence and contestation of legal and non-legal norms in territorial disputes?
• What insights does multidimensionality offer for rethinking sovereignty beyond state-centric paradigms?

Participants: 

Open to all. We encourage participation from scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and students across disciplines, geographies, and identities. The workshop aims to be inclusive, collaborative, and exploratory.

Format:

This special workshop is designed to showcase and develop works-in-progress rather than completed papers. We welcome exploratory ideas, theoretical models, and case-based reflections.

Participation:

If you are interested in sending an abstract (up to 500 words) for consideration or simply taking part in our roundtables, please send your email to j.nunez@mmu.ac.uk  by Friday 27th March 2026.

The e-mail accompanying your abstract should also contain the following information:

• Subject line: “SW God’s Sovereignty, Territorial Disputes and Multidimensionality.”
• Name
• Institutional affiliation (if any).

Thursday 4th December 2025

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

X (formerly, Twitter): https://x.com/DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world