It is
arguably a truism in international law and politics that an ultimate sovereign,
with a common legal bond or system of norms, will govern one territory
with population. What would happen if that one territory and population
had two ultimate and hierarchically equal sovereigns (legally speaking)
and, at the same time, two valid sets of norms? Would it be possible, for instance, that Israel and Palestine had
sovereign authority at the same time over Jerusalem?
If the
answer were positive, what would the consequences be—in terms of
territory, population, government and law?
So far, we
have introduced the Israel-Palestine difference in the context of this blog
series about TERRITORIAL DISPUTES.
Today I
include a short video to introduce myself, discuss a few points and share some
thoughts. Next week: territory (defence), government and law in relation to the
Israel-Palestine difference and now the EGALITARIAN SHARED SOVEREIGNTY would
apply to them to solve the dispute.
Previous posts of the
TERRITORIAL DISPUTE series (only about the Israel-Palestine difference below):
Jorge
Emilio Núñez
Twitter: @London1701
18th
May 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment