Wednesday, 20 October 2021

Juris North ASAP Roundtables 2022: “Sustainability”

 




Juris North ASAP Roundtables 2022

To follow up the 2020 Congress “Global Justice and Sovereignty” and the 2020 “Global Response to Crisis” Roundtables, Academics Stand Against Poverty (Yale’s ASAP) and Juris North will be working together again in 2022. We plan to have a set of three thematic roundtables running between April and June and a final Congress in September 2022. 

Title: Global Response to crisis: sustainability, SDGS and climate change

Thinking globally, acting locally

Aims:

. To critically assess local, regional and/or global law and policy that have to do with sustainability and its crossover with a specific thematic area.

. To explore different stakeholder views on a range of sustainability-related topics.

. To seek international perspectives and exchanges about a range of sustainability-related topics and explore possibilities for collaboration in terms of research, practice and education.

Final Target:

National and international legal and political orders around the world.

Lead by:

Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Manchester Law School

Dr Rita G. Klapper, Manchester Business School

Thematic areas:

·      Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (practice and education): lead by Dr Rita G. Klapper (UK and international). 

.      Gender: Lead by Dr Kay Lalor (UK) and Dr Natalina Stamile (Italy)

·      Access to rights: Lead by Dr Jorge E. Núñez (UK and Latin America)

·      Poverty, Sovereignty and Economic Rights: Lead by Dr Clarice Seixas Duarte (Brazil)

·      Climate change: Lead by Dr Danielle Denny (Brazil)

Participants: open to all. Ideally, multi-disciplinary, transversal and inclusive (academics, policy-makers, people at large from different states, religions, genders, ethnicities, etc.).

Format: ​Zoom, private sessions. We won’t be streaming the sessions live with exception of the final event.  We’ll make the keynote presentations public.

Dates/Times: monthly meetings. Why from April onwards?

April 2022: Date/Time TBC

May 2022: Date/Time TBC

June 2022: Date/Time TBC

Final event: September 2022 (TBC whether face to face or online, depending on the situation at the time in relation to the pandemic).

If you’re interested in sending an abstract (up to 500 words) for consideration or simply taking part in our roundtables, please send your email to j.nunez@mmu.ac.uk  by Friday 25th March 2022.

“How do Rules Allocate Authority?: Reading the PSPP Judgement Through the Lenses of Rules” by Gürkan Çapar [video]

 


“How do Rules Allocate Authority?: Reading the PSPP Judgement Through the Lenses of Rules”

Gürkan Çapar 

Ph.D. student at Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy.

Juris North Monthly Discussion

Wednesday 13th October 2021




Wednesday 20th October 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter@DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

Wednesday, 29 September 2021

Juris North Kelsen 2021 Congress [OPEN ACCESS (videos)]

 


Juris North Kelsen Congress 2021 (ONLINE)

Global Perspectives on Kelsen”[1]

Friday 24th and Saturday 25th September 2021, 10am-7pm BST

 

DAY 1: Friday 24th September 2021

Block 1:

Introduction by co-hosts Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora and Gonzalo Villa Rosas

Keynote Speaker 1

  • Dr Maris Köpcke Tinturé, University of Barcelona (Spain) and University of Oxford (UK), Kelsen’s Place in the History of Legal Validity

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Paper Authors 1 and 2

  • Dr Wei Feng, University of Political Science and Law (China), Hans Kelsen on Necessity, Hierarchy, and Content of Law
  • Dr Anna Taitslin, University of Canberra (Australia), Kelsen’s Basic Norm & Hart’s Secondary Rules in Comparative Study of the 20th c. Revolutionary Legal Change in Russia and Germany

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

YouTube: https://youtu.be/YdzEkWJ7rME

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/1512188995800502

Block 2:

Keynote Speaker 2

  •  Dr Mikhail Antonov, Higher School of Economics (Russia), Hans Kelsen and the Soviet Law

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Paper Authors 3 and 4

  • Dr Tomasz Widłak, University of Gdańsk (Poland), Kelsen’s Philosophy of International Law and the Project of Pure Theory of Law
  • Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora, University of Toronto (Canada), Clarifying Kelsenian Monism

YouTube: https://youtu.be/QwDWFbFtMMM

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/252561986930324

Block 3:

Keynote Speaker 3

  •  Dr Andrés Botero Bernal, University of Santander (UIS, Bucaramanga, Colombia), The Kelsen-Hart Debate on Normative Sanction: a Look beyond the Last of the Mohicans

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Paper Authors 5 and 6

  • Dr Carlo Garbarino Università Bocconi (Italy) andNYU Law School (United States), Expanding Kelsen’s Concept of Singular Rules and Production of Rules by Rules: Self-applied Rules and Nomo-Dynamic Networks
  • Dr Asya Ostroukh,University of the West Indies (Barbados), Kelsen in the Grenada Court”: Simeon McIntosh’s Contribution to the Understanding of Kelsen’s Theory of Revolutionary Legality

Closing remarks – End of day 1

YouTube: https://youtu.be/bblNwaqXyc8

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/584995522537449

DAY 2: Saturday 25th September 2021

Block 4:

Introduction by co-hosts Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora and Gonzalo Villa Rosas

Keynote Speaker 4

  • Dr Lars Vinx, University of Cambridge (UK), Hans Kelsen and the Crisis of Democracy

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Paper Authors 7 and 8

  • Jingshu Wang, University of Political Science and Law (China), Resolve Norm Conflicts and Uphold International Law:Kelsen’s Legacy in Contemporary Challenges
  • Dr Phil Edwards, Manchester Metropolitan University (UK), Kelsen and ‘Primitive’ International Law: Three Answers and a Question

YouTube: https://youtu.be/IMkxK9V5RhY

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/547599283178845

Block 5:

Keynote Speaker 5

  •  Dr Monika Zalewska, University of Lodz (Poland), Fictionalism in Hans Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Paper Authors 9 and 10

  • Dr Rubin Assis da Silveira Souza, Law School of São Paulo, FGV-SP, and. National Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentCNPq (Brazil), Kelsen on Kant’s Pure and Practical Reason Contradiction
  • Cristiano de Aguiar Portela Moita, Freie Universität Berlin (Germany), Wittgenstein’s Rule-Following Paradox in Kelsen’s Account of Legal Interpretation

YouTube: https://youtu.be/0XbEmPP6rUE

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/907769683170939

 

Block 6:

Keynote Speaker 6

  • Dr Carsten Heidemann, Bordesholm (Kiel Bar Association, Germany), Varieties of Validity

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

Open Floor Discussion and Closing remarks – End of day 2

YouTube: https://youtu.be/APkraEIcS9k

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JurisNorthDiscussionGroup/videos/4105199432941220


[1] In memory of Prof. Dr María Teresa López (UNLP, Argentina), Prof. Dr John Gardner (Oxford, UK) and Prof. Dr Eugenio Bulygin (UBA, Argentina)

Hashtags used on social media:

#JurisNorth2021
#Kelsen2021

Last but not least, as you know, all our Juris North events are completely free. I’d appreciate if those who book a ticket could send a donation to Fundação Angelica Goulart, which I represent globally.

Details about our Fundação and how to send your donation: https://drjorge.world/fundacao-angelica-goulart/ 

Wednesday 29th September 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter: @DrJorge_World
https://drjorge.world

Monday, 30 August 2021

Juris North Kelsen 2021 Congress

 


Juris North Kelsen Congress 2021 (ONLINE)

Global Perspectives on Kelsen”[1]

Friday 24th and Saturday 25th September 2021, 10am-7pm BST


[1] In memory of Prof. Dr María Teresa López (UNLP, Argentina), Prof. Dr John Gardner (Oxford, UK) and Prof. Dr Eugenio Bulygin (UBA, Argentina)

SCHEDULE

DAY 1: Friday 24th September 2021

Block 1: 10:00am-1:00pm

10:00am Introduction by co-hosts Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora and Gonzalo Villa Rosas

10:30am-11:30am Keynote Speaker 1

  • Dr Maris Köpcke Tinturé, University of Barcelona (Spain) and University of Oxford (UK), Kelsen’s Place in the History of Legal Validity

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

11:30am-1:00pm Paper Authors 1 and 2

  • Dr Wei Feng, University of Political Science and Law (China), Hans Kelsen on Necessity, Hierarchy, and Content of Law
  • Dr Anna Taitslin, University of Canberra (Australia), Kelsen’s Basic Norm & Hart’s Secondary Rules in Comparative Study of the 20th c. Revolutionary Legal Change in Russia and Germany

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

1:00pm-1:30pm Active Break

Block 2: 1:30pm-4:00pm

1:30pm-2:30pm Keynote Speaker 2

  •  Dr Mikhail Antonov, Higher School of Economics (Russia), Hans Kelsen and the Soviet Law

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

2:30pm-4:00pm Paper Authors 3 and 4

  • Dr Tomasz Widłak, University of Gdańsk (Poland), Kelsen’s Philosophy of International Law and the Project of Pure Theory of Law
  • Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora, University of Toronto (Canada), Clarifying Kelsenian Monism

4:00pm-4:30pm Active Break

Block 3: 4:30pm-7:00pm

4:30pm-5:30pm Keynote Speaker 3

  •  Dr Andrés Botero Bernal, University of Santander (UIS, Bucaramanga, Colombia), The Kelsen-Hart Debate on Normative Sanction: a Look beyond the Last of the Mohicans

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

5:30pm-7:00pm Paper Authors 5 and 6

  • Dr Carlo Garbarino Università Bocconi (Italy) andNYU Law School (United States), Expanding Kelsen’s Concept of Singular Rules and Production of Rules by Rules: Self-applied Rules and Nomo-Dynamic Networks
  • Dr Asya Ostroukh,University of the West Indies (Barbados), Kelsen in the Grenada Court”: Simeon McIntosh’s Contribution to the Understanding of Kelsen’s Theory of Revolutionary Legality

7:00pm Closing remarks – End of day 1

DAY 2: Saturday 25th September 2021

Block 4: 10:00am-1:00pm

10:00am Introduction by co-hosts Dr Jorge E. Núñez, Dr Jorge Luis Fabra Zamora and Gonzalo Villa Rosas

10:30am-11:30am Keynote Speaker 4

  • Dr Lars Vinx, University of Cambridge (UK), Hans Kelsen and the Crisis of Democracy

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

11:30am-1:00pm Paper Authors 7 and 8

  • Jingshu Wang, University of Political Science and Law (China), Resolve Norm Conflicts and Uphold International Law:Kelsen’s Legacy in Contemporary Challenges
  • Dr Phil Edwards, Manchester Metropolitan University (UK), Kelsen and ‘Primitive’ International Law: Three Answers and a Question

1:00pm-1:30pm Active Break

Block 5: 1:30pm-4:00pm

1:30pm-2:30pm Keynote Speaker 5

  •  Dr Monika Zalewska, University of Lodz (Poland), Fictionalism in Hans Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

2:30pm-4:00pm Paper Authors 9 and 10

  • Dr Rubin Assis da Silveira Souza, Law School of São Paulo, FGV-SP, and. National Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentCNPq (Brazil), Kelsen on Kant’s Pure and Practical Reason Contradiction
  • Cristiano de Aguiar Portela Moita, Freie Universität Berlin (Germany), Wittgenstein’s Rule-Following Paradox in Kelsen’s Account of Legal Interpretation

4:00pm-4:30pm Active Break

 Block 6: 4:30pm-6:30pm

4:30pm-5:30pm Keynote Speaker 6

  • Dr Carsten Heidemann, Bordesholm (Kiel Bar Association, Germany), Varieties of Validity

Q&As interactive session between speakers and Zoom attendees.

5:30pm-6:30pm Open Floor Discussion and Closing remarks – End of day 2

Should you want to join us live via Zoom and interact directly with our speakers, please book your free ticket using our Juris North Eventbrite page. Note you’ll have to book separately for each day. 


Day 1 tickets:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/168427825159


Day 2 tickets:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/168428392857

The event will be transmitted live via YouTube and Facebook for those who may not be able to get a ticket (note we have limited availability). 


We’ll be using the following hashtags on social media:

#JurisNorth2021
#Kelsen2021

Last but not least, as you know, all our Juris North events are completely free. I’d appreciate if those who book a ticket could send a donation to Fundação Angelica Goulart, which I represent globally.

Details about our Fundação and how to send your donation: https://drjorge.world/fundacao-angelica-goulart/ 

Monday 30th August 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter: @DrJorge_World
https://drjorge.world

Saturday, 7 August 2021

Christ Consciousness. 8: Self-mastery: the battle towards God and inner peace

 


Self-mastery: the battle towards God and inner peace

The world is in chaos. Truly, because many of us are in chaos within (our inner world) our local, regional and international contexts (the outer world) present ourselves disjointed, broken, unfair. Unsurprisingly, our leaders do not lead. More accurately, our leaders represent our lack of direction. Why? Because many of us have settled for external approval rather than inner truth. Something I have recently read about heroes and superstars says it all:

“Henry Kissinger expressed it unusually well in his book review of Churchill, and I quote: ‘Our age finds it difficult to come to grips with figures like Winston Churchill. The political leaders with whom we are familiar generally aspire to be superstars rather than heroes. The distinction is crucial. Superstars strive for approbation; heroes walk alone. Superstars crave consensus; heroes define themselves by the judgment of a future they see it as their task to bring about. Superstars seek success in a technique for eliciting support; heroes pursue success as the outgrowth of inner values’.” (“Heroes vs. Superstars,” Ziglar, available at https://www.ziglar.com/motivation/heroes-vs-superstars/ ).

Although it seems we lack direction, accurately, we are longing for inner peace. Puzzling as it may sound, however, we seek for the answers beyond ourselves. There are those who delude themselves with quick fixes such as drugs, alcohol, sex and toxic relationships. Yet, there are others who are subtler and appear to have a reasonably balanced life but depend on arguably “healthier” options like constant company and different kinds of compulsions (e.g. sports, religion, nutrition). Able to see past the apparent, the wise Bulleh Shah and Jesus express what in reality happens:

“Yes, yes; you’ve read thousands of books but you’ve never tried to read yourself; you rush into your temples, into your mosques, but you have never tried to enter your own heart; futile are all your battles with the devil for you have never tried to fight your own desires.” (Bulleh Shah)

“…you cancel the word of God for the sake of your own tradition … These people honor me with their lifes, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship is a farce, for they teach man-made ideas as commands from God.” (Matthew 15:6-9 conf. Isaiah 29:13).

How do we gain inner peace? you may ask. How do we avoid these addictions and dependency on the external, whether a situation, a person, an object, and action or omission? The answer is as simple as hard to achieve. The answer is (has always been) within. It is high time we stop blaming God, Allah, the Universe, the Source, the Eternal, the One, the Many (like in every post, the name we use here is irrelevant. It is just a man-made label for communication. Therefore, I use them interchangeably). In a similar vein, it is time to stop pointing the finger at our Mum, Dad, neighbour, president, prime minister, etc. Inner peace and, consequently, outer peace, starts in, with and through ourselves. St. Benedict and Rumi give us a clue:

“The ladder erected is our life on earth, and if we humble our hearts the Lord will raise it to heaven. We may call our body and soul the sides of the ladder, into which our divine vocation has fitted the various steps of humility and discipline as we ascend (The Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 7:8-9).

“At times the holy warrior feels expansion, at other times pain, torment, contraction. Our earthly bodies try with all their might denying and then stealing our soul’s light.” (Rumi, The MasnaviBook Two, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 173).

Indeed, it takes our own self to attain inner peace. Firstly, to own the fact it is our choice and it is within our grasp (the “no excuses” motto applies here). Secondly, to set the intention to work for it. Thirdly, to bring that intention to reality: to actually do the work (aka less preaching, more doing). Finally, to stay consistent. Every change requires time and effort. The bigger the challenge, the more discipline will need. A proviso: it is a daily battle within, I must caution you. Hence, do not rely on motivation.  

Mmm, it sounds like hard work, I am certain at this point many may think. You are completely right. But, if you are not willing to work hard for yourself and for your inner peace, at least be content in acknowledging that you accepted willingly the chaos within and without. After all, the world cannot give the gift of peace (conf. John 14:27).

For those who want to join the change, both inner and, as a result outer, I leave you with St. Paul and Buddha and their wisdom about the mastery of our body and our mind.

“Do you not realize that in a race everyone runs, but only one person gets the prize? So run to win! All athletes are disciplined in their training. They do it to win a prize that will fade away, but we do it for an eternal prize. So I run with purpose in every step. I am not just shadowboxing. I discipline my body like an athlete, training it to do what it should. Otherwise, I fear that after preaching to others I myself be disqualified.” (1 Corinthians 9:24-27).

“A man’s mind makes him a Buddha, or it may make him a beast. Misled by error, one becomes a demon; enlightened, one becomes a Buddha. Therefore, control your mind and do not let it deviate from the right path.” (The Teaching of Buddha, Tokyo, Japan: Bukkyō Dendō Kyōkai, 2012, 12).

Previous post:

Christ Consciousness. 7: The solitary hero and the false prophets

Available at: https://london1701.blogspot.com/2021/06/christ-consciousness-7-solitary-hero.html

Saturday 07th July 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter: @DrJorge_World

https://drjorge.world

Thursday, 1 July 2021

Academic Research II [video]

 


Academic Research II

Research background.

Planning the research proposal structure.



Wednesday 30th June 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter: @DrJorge_World
https://drjorge.world

Tuesday, 29 June 2021

Law as multidimensional phenomena [Post 24]

 


Validity and efficacy

Alchourrón and Bulygin state that in legal science there are empirical as well as logical issues.[1] It may seem that law as validity belongs only to the world of rules (where “logical” issues are to be found), and law as efficacy belongs only in the world of facts (where “empirical” issues are concerned). In any case, the relationship between validity and efficacy in the idea of law is “synergetic.” This is to say that although these attributes of “law” are meaningful individually, they capture more about what law is when taken together.

To summarize what has been said already, what law is might appear to be either:

  • Rules that are valid, whether or not they are effective; or
  • Rules that regulate behavior, whether supposed “valid” or otherwise.

A situation in which valid laws existed but were ineffective, can be described as a state of law having “broken down;” that here laws were only “theoretical”, or were “fictitious.” In this case, the law exists, but does not rule. The full meaning of “law” has clearly not been realized in such a situation.

A situation fitting the opposite description can also be imagined. Here, conduct is effectively commanded, forbidden, and regulated etc., but the governing “rules” are not recognized as “valid.” The possible criteria of validity are of course many, but on whatever chosen grounds, it is imaginable that these rules may not (for example) have been made by way of legitimate process, or they may command the immoral, forbid the legitimate, or regulate that which should not be regulated. Here, again, the full meaning of “law” has not been realized: the arbitrary word of a dictator “is law.”

It seems clear, then, that the true answer to what law is has to be more closely approximated in a situation in which law is both effective and valid. The meaning of “law”, though not of course exhausted by these two concepts, is nevertheless more deficient when one of them is missing.

But is the relationship between these two conceptual components simply one of co-presence in the concept “law”? Or do they in some sense interact, modifying each other? Alexy presents two possible accounts of this relationship, one “restricted” and one “comprehensive”:

According to the restricted view, what the law is depends exclusively on what has actually been issued and is socially efficacious. It is a matter of social fact. According to the comprehensive view, what the law is depends on what it is correctly taken to be. This view constitutes the participant’s perspective.”[2]

The “restricted” view, that validity depends only on efficacy, implies that socially effective norms may be valid even if they are severely unjust. Only “intolerable” injustice makes an effective norm lose its validity, because in order to be designated “intolerable” it would be clear that the populace was not tolerating it, and that its efficacy was thereby reduced.[3] Such an account of validity Bobbio describes as “reductionistic”[4]—since validity is reduced to efficacy. But on the more “comprehensive” view of validity that Alexy describes, value judgments of another kind are involved.

For Joseph Raz too, the validity of law is not achieved by its efficacy alone.[5]

Bulygin[6] mentions three different ways in which “facts” and “norms” may have a particular relationship: (1) in the case of issuing a norm; (2) in the case of derogating a norm; and (3) (he writes) “[a]nother necessary condition for the validity […] of a norm is according to Kelsen the efficacy of the legal order to which this norm belongs […].”

Previous post:

Next theme:

Validity and efficacy: synergy (available from September 2021).

Author of:

Territorial Disputes and State Sovereignty. International Law and Politics (London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2020).

Sovereignty Conflicts and International Law and Politics: A Distributive Justice Issue (London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2017).

Tuesday 29th June 2021

Dr Jorge Emilio Núñez

Twitter: @DrJorge_World
https://drjorge.world


[1] C.E. Alchourrón and E. Bulygin, Normative Systems (Library of Exact Philosophy, Springer-Verlag Wien,1971), 53.

[2] R. Alexy, “On the Concept and the Nature of Law,” Ratio Juris 21:3 (2008): 281-299, 297 (emphasis added).

[3] Ibid., 282.

[4] N. Bobbio, Teoria Generale del Diritto (Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore, 1993), 31.

[5] J. Raz, “The Identity of Legal Systems,” California Law Review 59:3 (1971): 795-815, 801.

[6] Eugenio Bulygin, “An Antinomy in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law,” Ratio Juris 3:1 (1990): 29-45.